Tokyo Barrister: Start the law firm bankruptcy

Following the judge's instructions, the trial continued.

The next proof came to Mikiko's second paper for alleged plagiarism.In the first paper just now, the issue involved was whether the relevant experiments were outsourced and whether it constituted academic misconduct.Under this issue, there seems to be some room for maneuver.So will the same leeway still be present in the second paper now?

The atmosphere in the courtroom unknowingly became dignified, and the light emitted by the hidden incandescent long lamps on both sides also became dazzling.Under the battle between the lawyers of both sides, many observers have realized that this is an extremely bloody, life-and-death battle.

The university seniors in the front row couldn't help but put their hands on their knees, leaned forward slightly, and watched everything that happened in the court with extremely serious eyes.Drops of cold sweat oozed from the foreheads of some college students.Even though Asakura Yan had the upper hand, the entire debate process was too thrilling.

Zhu Ze sorted out the materials in his hand, then stood up again, looked coldly at the plaintiff male lawyer, and then said: "Chief referee. Next, the defendant will present the seventh set of evidence. The first evidence, the author A copy of the acceptance letter of the plaintiff Mikiko Yui's paper "About the Acidification of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules in Proteins". The letter of publication comes from the journal tbio. The second piece of evidence is the internal investigation email sent by the journal involved. The third piece of evidence is the paper self-examination email sent by the university. The fourth piece of evidence is the comparison group of papers "Phosphate Group Directed Molecule and Protein Acidification" "Phosphate Group Directed Molecule Imprinting Method" "Phosphate Group Directed Molecule in Protein Acidification" Four papers including "Characterization Phenomenon of Oriented Phosphate Group Molecules" and "Indeterminate Acidification Conditions of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules". The fifth piece of evidence is the results of comparison and analysis of papers. The sixth piece of evidence is a brief report by the expert group on Mei Xizi's second paper involving plagiarism. "

One piece of evidence after another was thrown out.

This time the enemy seems to be more aggressive.

Miyagawa in the plaintiff's seat, her hand holding the pen was covered with sweat, and her body was shaking slightly due to tension.In particular, the pieces of evidence presented by Takezawa sounded like hammers in the ears, making people feel dizzy.Even so, Miyagawa still bit his lips lightly, and took a pen to quickly record the other party's opinions.

Takezawa paused for a moment, as if leaving room for the audience to breathe. The next second, her voice sounded again: "The above evidence proves that the plaintiff, Mikiko Yui, submitted an article titled "On Phosphate Groups" to the tbio journal. Oriented Molecules in the Acidification of Proteins". Later, the journal received a report that there was plagiarism in the papers involved. Afterwards, the journals involved in eucalyptus launched an internal investigation and sent a letter of assistance to the university. Kyoto University formally Form an investigation team to investigate."

Hearing this, Bei Yuan frowned slightly.

Someone reported it again.

Just now, Mikiko's first paper was reported.

And now, this second paper is also reported.

...

Could it be that Mikiko was being targeted?

Beiyuan kept chewing on the extremely obscure information revealed by the other party's evidence, trying to get a little bit of the truth of the incident from some fragments and tubes.

Takezawa continued: "After a joint investigation by the journal and the expert group, the plaintiff Mei Xizi's papers were suspected of plagiarizing four papers, namely "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification", "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecule Imprinting Method", "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules" and "Phosphate Group Oriented molecules are in the characterization phenomenon of protein acidification" "The indeterminate acidification conditions of phosphate group-oriented molecules". The expert group of Kyoto University checked through the third-party paper repetition rate appraisal agency."

"apdlu——is a well-known international paper duplication identification database. A plagiarism check report numbered kuyt was made on Mei Xizi's second paper suspected of plagiarism. After the plagiarism check of the database, Mei Xizi and the above four papers There is a large area of ​​duplication. Specifically, there is a 36% duplication rate with the first article of the comparison group "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification", and the second "Imprinting Method of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules" in the comparison group There is a repetition rate of 16%; there is a repetition rate of 21% compared with the third article of the comparison group "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules in the Characterization of Protein Acidification", and the fourth article of the comparison group "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules in Indeterminate Acidification Condition "There is a 27% repetition rate."

"In response to the plagiarism check results of the above-mentioned paper duplication identification database, the relevant expert group of Kyoto University conducted a substantive review of Mei Xizi's paper and formed a corresponding report. After discussion by the expert group, the members of the relevant investigation team believed that Mei Xizi's duplication with the control group of the paper , is not simply a repetition of words or references, but directly constitutes plagiarism of the text in the control group of the corresponding paper, and does not indicate the reference or source. Accordingly, Mei Xizi’s paper constitutes academic misconduct.”

Takezawa's voice was resounding.

It seems to give people the feeling that she is like a prosecutor.

At this moment, she seemed to be sternly accusing Mikiko of all the crimes committed in court.

Only her voice could be heard and said: "Chief referee. At present, the fact that Mikiko's second paper is suspected of plagiarism is very clear. The relevant plagiarism facts include not only the screening results of international authoritative software, but also the judgment conclusions of corresponding senior scholars. The plaintiff, Mei Xizi, plagiarized the above four papers at the same time, and patched up the relevant results. This act is enough to prove that the plaintiff has no integrity in academic research, disregards the most basic academic ethics codes, and recklessly stitches together, Cutting other people's research results! After doing such an act, they still have to beat back and sue the university. How can such a reversal of black and white be allowed to be recognized by the law!
"

Takezawa scolded Mikiko's behavior loudly.

With the display of this series of extremely powerful evidence, the wind direction in court has changed again.There are not only the identification results of the software, but also the judgment conclusions of scholars.Moreover, Mei Xizi plagiarized not only one paper, but four papers in total. This is a solid proof, how can I refute it? !
The observers in the rows behind couldn't help whispering again, and the media reporters also quietly wrote down the latest status of the trial with their pens, so as to recover the details of the plaintiff's alleged plagiarism.

The materials displayed by Takezawa are piled up on the table just like that.Stacks of thick materials, the cold numbers on them, and the investigation conclusions stamped by many authoritative scholars with their bright red signature stamps almost irrefutably point to the fact that Mikiko plagiarized the relevant papers. fact.

These are like the majestic volcanoes in the East, bringing a sense of oppression as tight as the tide.

All these pieces of evidence seemed to be shot at the plaintiff's seat like sharp bullets.

For the plaintiff, is there any hope for this lawsuit...