The Modern Age of the Mysterious

After Rabilins' death, I'm not sure how readers will feel, but as a somewhat "anti-traditional" story design, I would like to say my own.

I believe that in the minds of many people, Rabilins Pompei is very strong. It is undeniable that if it weren't for being hit hard and targeted, his strength could even serve as a mid-story boss.

However, due to the setting of the plot, the conflict between him and Alicia broke out in Ocean City in the early stage of the story, which created a situation that the result of this conflict must be arranged in Ocean City.

As an aside, I think this setup is actually pretty good. The development of the world story will not follow the development of the protagonist. For example, it will not wait until the protagonist is strong enough to meet an opponent like Rabilins. This adds to the believability of the story environment.

An important point I want to make is that it seems that Rabilins was killed by Sean and Alicia, but his death was more of a "self-destruction".

In fact, it can be seen that Labillings Pompeii and Charles Kennedy are very similar - they have strong hard power, but they have huge flaws in personality.

Therefore, Rabilins' failure was more a failure after being seduced by power due to his personality flaws...

It's not that the strength is not as strong as the Xiao Ai Alliance.

So, my advice is, don't be surprised by Rabilins' defeat, because in this world, panel data alone is not enough, understanding, choice and mind are more important.

The twisted heart of Rabilins Pompeii made him a little stunned, such a person with huge flaws—actually pretty good.

It's just that the dishes are not obvious, but his dishes are hidden under a gorgeous halo.

The same goes for Charles Kennedy, who also has a twisted personality.

This kind of personality determines that they are "strong men who look strong", but they actually have weaknesses that will lead to "self-destruction".

That's why, after designing "The First Rescue of Aaliyah" and "The Lion Slaughter", I always felt that I was different from some readers who had opinions.

The strength is not the strength of the panel value, this is the story, not the "battle simulator".

I know that my way of writing is a bit "rebellious", but I'm always talking about "refining Qi and fighting the Nascent Soul". If you are always addicted to the idea of ​​​​upgrading online games and fighting monsters, you may not understand that I wrote the Boss as a living creature. People, what kind of hard work.

You will still be scolded and will not be understood.

However, I know that although it may lead to incomprehension, my creation is intentional.

If the creator does not even have such courage and courage, it will be difficult to achieve any progress and breakthrough in what he does.

Having said that, in fact, the design concept of the story about the slaughter of the lion about challenging Kennedy is obvious:

The destruction of Labillings and Kennedy is more close to "self-destruction". The protagonist and even Alicia's team just stepped on the wave of their self-destruction.

So, for the presentation of the story, it depends on how you understand it.

If you only look at the results of the battle, some readers think that Sean's performance is a bug. Such an understanding is too simplistic and rude, and it is not appropriate.

Because in such an event, Sean was only part of their self-destruction process.

However, he is the core protagonist, so I naturally handed over the "key actions" to him, that's all.

In addition, let’s talk about another way of thinking about this kind of confrontation in the early stage.

What Jack, Queen, King... these are just a classification of explorers,

What if in the middle and late stages of the story, it is God who is fighting?

Thinking about it this way, then these people with their own shortcomings, even Joker-level ~www.readwn.com~ are really not inconceivable "strong enemies".

It stands to reason that as an author, there is no need to explain so much about your own creation.

However, speaking these things out is also a sort of thinking for oneself.

I also expressed some words, some of my friends could not understand and criticized me.

Friends who hold the "Qi Refining and the Nascent Soul Theory", I would like to say that if you always put your own understanding above the author's writing, this will lead to the "homogenization" of your reading experience, which will lead to the "homogenization" of the author's creation. Narrowing", because if all kinds of "dogmas" and "hidden rules" are always put forward, some writers will not know what to do.

In short... they are the ones who attack the "routines", and they are the ones who maintain the "dogma"...

How can someone write it!

(╯‵□′)╯︵┻━┻

Of course, just because my arrangement is logical, it is impossible to assume that the market can understand it...

Whether it can be understood by the market, I don't know. Anyway, I wrote it carefully according to my own ideas, which is worthy of my conscience.

Also, readers who understand what I'm saying and like this story, I love you.

As for writing, I will still take it seriously.

https://

Genius remembers the address of this site in one second: . Mobile version reading website: