Superstar

ads_wz_txt;

495 Confession

On Friday, November 17th, "Schindler's List" was officially screened in 25 theaters. The first batch of thirteen critics’ voices of praise attracted everyone’s attention. Although it is said that this is a movie about Jews, and that it is a heavy movie about war, the premiere weekend attracted many viewers into the cinema to watch this movie created by Steven Spielberg. Outstanding work.

Among the many audiences, Jews, sociologists, and professional film critics account for a very high proportion, especially high intellectuals. 'The background of the entire era and the subject matter of historical changes always have a strong interest. I hope to see the reflection of the entire society and the entire culture from such an entertainment carrier as the movie.

This also made the premiere weekend of "Schindler's List" full of academic atmosphere, and Steven Spielberg did not disappoint everyone. After entering the premiere weekend, the second batch of professional film critics was released. The tone pushed this work to the position of a classic masterpiece.

This time, as many as twelve media outlets gave "Schindler's List" a full score of 100, which can be described as a strong screen.

The San Francisco Chronicle believes that “by any standard, this shocking and powerful film made by Steven Spielberg can be regarded as a milestone in the art of filmmaking.”

"USA Today", who repeatedly voted against Hugo's starring movie before, was also convinced this time. "With flawless details and reality, the film described the darkness and fear of that era in detail in the form of a virtual documentary, but directly The three main roles outlined by the narrative technique clearly show the struggles and pains of human beings under the background of the times. Every actor's performance is perfect!"

Even before the film’s release, "Entertainment Weekly", which had always been pessimistic and "colorful", did not hesitate to express its firm support position with full marks. "Spielberg's realistic and clear stance is different from any of his previous positions. A film, even different from any previous film about World War II, made us deeply feel the darkest period of the twentieth century, and let us deeply feel the infinite influence that still remains in society today. ."

In addition, the "New York Times" also joined the ranks of the other three authoritative media-"Los Angeles Times", "Hollywood Report", "Variety Show"-and declared their praise for the movie with full marks. What is surprising is the way Spielberg captures the fear, the way the camera moves, the use of black and white'color', and the advancement of the plot. The delicate but true infusion of that fear and anger into the soul of every audience middle."

In addition, the "Wall Street Journal (. stated, "This is a movie beyond the ordinary ranks, and it can even be said to be extraordinary. The surging'excitement' and abundant art run through."

The comment of "Reel Viewing" said, "This movie touches our souls so deeply. This deep and powerful energy is also very rare in the history of film. At the same time, it is this power that makes watching movies become It was an excellent experience of the spirit of spirit."

"TV Guide" also gave full marks, "Director Steven Spielberg has reached an almost unsurpassed state-morally serious, "spiritual" but amazing epic masterpiece , But at the same time it's easy to get close to the hearts of the audience."

These film reviews with full scores are so strong and powerful, the praise of authoritative media has become the most shining halo on the premiere weekend of "Schindler's List", attracting the attention of audiences from all over the United States.

This time, even the "Globe and Mail", which has never given up on Hugo's work before, gave an 88-point comment, "a work full of power and influence!"

The 80 points given by "Rolling Stone" magazine is the lowest score among the 31 film reviews currently in the public eye. This is an interpretation of historical documents, but the film’s choice of perspective and narrative is far more sincere than its ambitious marketing intentions. The academics will not judge this film, but judge by the weight of the subject matter. At this point, Spielberg has grasped the most accurate yardstick, which is worthy of appreciation!"

The minimum score is 80 points, which can be said to be a phenomenon of no bad reviews, even if there are some criticisms on the film reviews, for example, "The Washington Post (the. thinks, "Admittedly, Spear Berg's bad habits as a commercial director still appeared at certain moments, especially towards the end, when a long and deliberately sensational confession and tearful part fell into the sentimentality of Spielber's format, which seemed deliberate and redundant; But before this unfortunate scene,'Schindler's List' tells a three-hour'fine' colorful story, full of human'sexual' light, and at the same time it is exciting and ups and downs."

But the "Washington Post" still gave a high score of 88 points, which proves that the flaws are not concealed.

"Schindler's List", bathed in praise, finally achieved a strong score of 94 points in the media review, which is generally considered to be among all the movies released in 1993. The most shocking and profound works at the same time.

This is also the highest-rated work in the eyes of film critics among all works by Steven since his debut.

Prior to this, even if Steven’s works received another ‘color’ at the box office, including the "Jurassic Park" that swept the army this summer, none of them could be recognized by film critics. This is also the reason why people have always been accustomed to calling Steven a commercial film. Steven is a genre film director who has won the hearts of the audience but has never been able to make a breakthrough in art.

But this time, "Schindler's List" has undoubtedly received unanimous recognition for the excavation of human sex, the excavation of the times, and the discussion of humanities and psychology. This also marks the previous media His guess has finally come to a conclusion. "Whether Steven can get rid of the commercial director model and shoot a film worthy of digging deeper in the humanities and the arts", the answer is yes, 100% yes.

The high song of the media review is the recognition of Steven by the film critics, and the score of the theater comes from the recognition of Steven by the audience, whether the audience is willing to accept a "artist Steven" instead of "business history" "Tivin"? Finally, the theater score ‘handed’ a score of "a" as the answer.

Obviously, Steven's speculation on the audience's heart and grasp of commercial elements are still recognized by everyone. The audience's willingness to score "a" for "Schindler's List" is extremely rare.

After the premiere weekend, "Schindler's List" is still undoubtedly a classic, among the top halls of movies.

Compared with "Schindler's List", the "Farewell You Qingtian" screened two weeks ago is more and more insignificant. If it is placed at other times, the media reviews 84, and the theater score is "b". This is a result. It's already very rare, but the problem is that "Farewell to the Sentimental Heaven" is also a grade behind director James Ivory's previous works, such as "Howard Manor", and now it is on the same level as "Schindler's List". Compared with that, it has shrunk two grades even more.

Previously, it was generally believed that James, as a director with deep heritage and distinctive art, must surpass Steven in the charm of his works. Therefore, the media have expressed that "farewell to the sentimental heaven" and hope to continue "Howard Manor" last year. "Schindler's list" may become a stepping stone to "say goodbye to the sentimental heaven".

But now it seems that Steven gave everyone a surprise, and he was born with the momentum of sweeping the army. Now almost all the media believe that "Schindler's list" has absolute strength to achieve more in the next awards ceremony. High evaluation, this is a movie that perfectly combines business and art!

Don’t say "Farewell to You Tian", even the other currently released works don’t seem to have enough weight. "Schindler’s List" has reached a brand new level in terms of subject matter, depth, artistic style, and overall completion. The height is unattainable by other works.

It is conceivable that in the next awards ceremony, the performance of "Schindler's List" is bound to affect the hearts of countless people. But that’s all afterwards~www.readwn.com~ At present, the media is still paying more attention to the film’s box office performance, whether "Schindler's List" can continue Steven’s previous strong box office appeal, Yu If after three consecutive works have dedicated the "fine" lottery room performance, can this magical performance continue, what kind of answer will the single box office of this movie "hand in"?

These are the highlights.

This is a very peculiar thing for the North American film market. Dajia is concerned about a film that is only available in 25 theaters, instead of focusing on the "Adams Family" that is shown in 2,600 theaters across the United States. Values ​​(addams.. values, you know, "The Adams (the.addams., which was released two years ago, achieved outstanding box office results of US$113 million, ranking it in the North American box office rankings that year. The seventh place at the end of the year, this sequel is also coming. But it is a pity that it was robbed of a lot of limelight by "Schindler's List".

Soon, the box office results of "Schindler's List" on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday will come out. Although we have to wait until the exact data is confirmed on Monday, the error is generally not too large. "Schindler's List" won a box office of US$2.25 million in the premiere of 25 theaters with a box office of US$90,000 in a single theater!

After this number came out, almost everyone was shocked.