From small town academic to chief scientist

Corrupt scholars, uneducated, without diplomas, vampire fans, cancerous scum.

It has to be said that Yang Shuai basically grasped all their pain points.

If this group of civil science teachers who spoke had a high school education level, Yang Shuai would lose.

They can read the history of any dynasty, and Yang Shuai also admits defeat.

No, it stimulated their sore spots, and they started to squirt with Yang Shuai.

However, this group of people soon realized the charm of Zu'an's liberal arts champion, and they were so criticized that they couldn't say a word.

Just when there was a heated debate on the Internet about Zhou Yi and Zhao Ruinan.

Yamadao Kazuki has united with Jin Xiangtai, William and other teams and began to question the National Association of Mathematics and Its Applications.

[Dear Mr. Qiu, please discuss whether we need to discuss the results of the naming awards for question A, maybe add three naming awards.

Mainly we have the following questions:

First, we all have perfect mathematical models, accurate program execution, and beautiful layout and writing. Mr. Zhou only asked three more situations than us in the third question.

Moreover, these 24 situations of Mr. Zhou have not been verified for reliability and monitoring at all. Is this inconsistent with the rigor of mathematics?

Of course, we do not deny the correctness of the model. Zhou Sang's model is perfect and we are amazed.

Second, our papers are all equally perfect. However, we almost completed the paper one to two hours earlier than Zhou Yi. We submitted the paper at 10 pm on the 20th, while Zhou Sang's was almost early in the morning. Is this true? It shows that our team is more competitive than Zhou Sang. 】

The final ones were surprisingly the group of Kim Sang-tae of Seoul National University, the group of Sando Ilki of Eastern Economic University, and the group of William of Imperial College of Technology.

The papers of these three groups are the most competitive and valuable, so when they posted on Twitter together, they also attached four papers.

At this moment, the chairman of the evaluation committee of the National Federation of Mathematics and Its Applications was caught off guard.

After all, it seems

What the hell is this?

Do you deserve to dare to question our decision?

I've given you face.

Is it true that the difference between your paper and Zhouyi is not noticeable at all?

So their inquiries are destined to be ignored.

What is the identity of this group of undergraduates, and what is the identity of these professors? They are not worthy and do not bother to answer this question.

Although it did not cause much turmoil in international public opinion, it caused a lot of turmoil domestically.

Because these leaders were sprayed by Yang Shuai so much that they blocked Yang Shuai.

Seeing this statement now is like manna, giving them new life.

[It seems that the organizing committee of Chou Country was so questioned that they dared not speak, so it was just good luck that Zhou Yi’s paper won the title award.

Young people do not need to regard temporary luck as strength. Luck is not permanent, but strength is.

The real universe of mathematics is its unresolved conjectures. 】

[That's right, it's just luck. It's just good luck. Other people's doubts are well-founded and they can't even find anything wrong with it. 】

[Zhao Ruinan of Beijing University is the idol among undergraduates and the number one person in mathematics. 】

These similar words are usually used in Douyin and on the scarves.

While belittling Zhouyi, he also belittled Zhouyi's school, and then promoted Beijing University.

For a time, Chongqing University was also in a very passive situation.

Although he clearly won the title award, he has lost such a reputation. It may be even more difficult to change.

Only some sane people have analyzed it.

But in view of the insufficient level, the reason is that the third question of Zhouyi has three more situations, so it is the champion.

Yamashima Kazuki and other teams couldn't wait for the result, and then saw Zhou Yi's Twitter,

[Zhou Sang, don’t be anxious. Even if you want to lose, you have to let us be convinced that you lose. Otherwise, we will just think you are lucky. The 24 situations are indeed perfect, but your paper lacks rigor. 】

[Zhou Zhou Oppa, we in Korea and Seoul also have the same view of Smita. We suspect that Yau chose you because you are a Daxia native. There must be some inside story, and we are not convinced.

Otherwise, among the four perfect papers, your paper was selected as the title award, and we could only receive the O award. 】

[Mr.zhou, why not wait for a few days? We only need a reason. We do not doubt Yau. We respect Mr. Qiu very much. 】

All three teams from the three schools were unconvinced.

One is doubting the rigor of Zhouyi's paper, and the other is doubting that Yau was once a member of the Daxia Kingdom and had special care for the people of the Daxia Kingdom.

As for Imperial College London, they are more sensible and just need an explanation.

Because that was Yau, and they didn't want to offend such a top scholar in the world.

They even wanted Mr. Qiu to leave Shuimu University and go to their Daying Empire.

Zhou Yi found it funny when he saw how they refused to admit defeat, but since they had questioned the organizing committee, there would probably be follow-up.

Even if you speak up and point out the gap, others will not recognize it.

The reason is very simple. My status is too low and I have no amazing results.

All I have to do is meet with domestic private educators and teachers first.

Originally, the Ugly Country Organizing Committee had no intention of paying attention to these three groups of teams, because from all aspects, they were not worthy of their response.

If you can't even see the difference between yourself and others, who are you to ask?

But this stick country actually implicated Yau, and the taste changed.

Everyone saw how fair and just Mr. Qiu was at the beginning, and everyone recognized the result.

But this group of people went so far as to openly question Yau.

Not only does it bring bad luck to Mr. Qiu, but it also brings bad luck to the reputation of the organizing committee.

The US competition has always focused on the quality of papers and is relatively fair. The country that has received the most O awards over the years has been Daxia. If it was unfair, it would have been given to Western countries such as Chou and Ying.

What's more, it also involves the reputation of a great mathematician.

This gave the organizing committee, which originally disdained replying to these three teams, a different idea.

Don’t you want an explanation? Let me give you an explanation.

The deputy leader of the organizing committee began to write on Twitter:

[We have seen your demands. Originally, we did not want to pay attention to such demands, because we do not even know where the gap between ourselves and others is, and we still have to question it. It is really embarrassing.

Now it is even more falsely accusing the character and integrity of the organizing committee and the great mathematician Yau, so we will give you a specific marking process in the near future to shut you up. 】

The remarks given by the deputy team leader were very sharp and showed no respect for them at all.

Mathematicians are already very arrogant people, and now they are being questioned for their selfish motives, and the blame is directed at the guests they invited. This is simply intolerable.

So there is no respect at all in terms of language, and there is no need to respect it.

If you spray it, spray it, not to mention that they have reason, and they won't worry so much.

Qiu is Yau. If he writes too many real-life domestic names, the book may not be preserved. Hope you understand.