Daguo Science and Technology started from the copycat system

However, when people were full of emotions, Ni Guangnan did not stop his words, only to see him continue to say:

"The fact is such a fact, and there is no need for me to lie.

Well, since Lin Chen invited me to the stage, let me introduce the news about the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip. "

Hearing this, the people at the scene paused for a while, and then temporarily let go of their surprise that Lin Chen's contribution to mobile phone chips reached 60%.

Instead, I focused on the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip mentioned by Ni Guangnan. This Phoenix S1 mobile phone Ni Guangnan said so much before, I don’t know the specific situation?

In response to this, the projection screen behind him also quickly changed into a comparison chart of the two chips.

The one on the left is the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone processor, and the one on the right is the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip.

Seeing this, people moved their eyes left and right to compare the performance parameters of the two mobile phones.

Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip.

Application platform: Motorola V1 mobile phone.

Process technology: 90 nanometers.

Whether the communication chip is built-in: Yes.

Communication chip: support the latest GPRS Class 12 communication standard, built-in integrated GPRS Class 12 communication module.

CPU model: ARM926 (ARM9 series, 32-bit RISC reduced instruction set, 5-stage pipeline design...)

CPU frequency: 220MHz.

Level 1 cache: 32KB.

Hardware acceleration: JAVA hardware acceleration.

Graphics Display GPU Independent: No.

CPU area: 12×12 square millimeters.

Packaging method: m-BGA packaging method. ...

Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip

Process technology: 130 nanometers.

Whether the communication chip is built-in: no.

Application platform: Sugon F2 mobile phone, Sugon A2 mobile phone.

CPU model: Phoenix S1 core (32-bit RISC reduced instruction set, 6-stage pipeline design...)

CPU frequency: 200MHz.

Level 1 cache: 64KB.

Hardware acceleration: JAVA hardware acceleration.

Dynamic turbo frequency: Phoenix dynamic turbo frequency technology (supports chip frequency increase from 10% to 120%)

Graphics Display GPU Independent: Yes.

GPU model: Phoenix T10 graphics display core.

CPU area: 14×14 square millimeters.

Packaging method: m-BGA packaging method.

At this time, the people at the scene looked at the above data parameters, especially seeing that among the two mobile phone processors, the CPU frequency of the Phoenix mobile phone chip was 20MHz lower than that of Texas Instruments.

When it was only 200MHz, people showed puzzled eyes.

What's going on?

Didn't Ni Guangnan say before that the Phoenix mobile phone chip beat the 90-nanometer Texas Instruments mobile phone processor with 130 nanometers? Why is this the result now?

Was Ni Guangnan sure he was right? Are you sure 130nm beats 90nm?

Why is the frequency of the Phoenix mobile phone chip so much less than that of the Texas Instruments OMAP1710?

We must know that in this era, a 20MHz increase can make many people willing to pay for it. As a result, the chip frequency of the Phoenix mobile phone chip is so much less than 20MHz. Is this sure to defeat the Motorola OMAP1710 mobile phone chip?

Of course, the Phoenix mobile phone chip is not without bright spots. In the comparison chart, they keenly found that the Phoenix mobile phone chip has a technology called dynamic turbo frequency.

The dynamic turbo technology allows the chip's operating frequency to be automatically adjusted from 10% to 120%.

Among them, the operating frequency reaches 120%, which represents overclocking!

This overclocking is a new innovation in mobile phones. Although overclocking can only achieve 120% and only increase by 20%, it is also the world's first mobile phone chip that can automatically overclock.

As for the independent GPU in the future, it is indeed a bright spot. Before that, the graphics display of the mobile phone chip was directly integrated in the CPU.

At this time, Sugon Technology has directly independent the graphics display, which is also an unprecedented innovation, that is, what kind of experience can the independent graphics display, that is, the GPU, bring to mobile phones?

Of course, there are only a few who know how to do it. Most of the nearly 3,000 people at the scene don’t know what mobile phone chips are. They only know a few parameters, such as the key value of CPU frequency.

So when they saw the performance comparison parameters at the press conference, they expressed doubts.

Ask Ni Guangnan if he made a mistake just now, the sentence that 130 nanometers defeated 90 nanometers.

Regarding this, Ni Guangnan also recovered from the projection screen behind him, and then turned to look at Lin Chen.

Ni Guangnan had never seen the PPT of this press conference, so he didn't know what the next page was.

Seeing this, Lin Chen also waved his hand, and then a comparison picture of mobile phone software running scores called "AnTuTu Mobile Open Source Performance Test" appeared on it.

In this running score picture, the running scores of Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip and Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip appear respectively.

In the running score, there are total scores and other scores. Among them, the CPU running score, GPU running score and first-level cache of the Phoenix mobile phone chip have completely crushed the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip!

As for their respective scores, the total score of the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip is 2590 points, the running score of CPU is 946, and the running score of GPU is 1357 points...

Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip has a total score of 1924 points, CPU running points 875 points, GPU running points 731 points...

Looking at the effect comparison chart above, everyone on the scene showed stunned expressions. They never expected the result to be like this.

The CPU frequency of the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip is obviously 20MHz lower than that of Texas Instruments. Why did the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip win in the end?

And what is even more shocking is that the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip has completely crushed the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip.

Whether it is the computing power of mobile phones or the ability of graphics display, they are all completely defeated. Among them, the ability of mobile phone CPU computing is defeated by Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip.

However, there are not many Sugon mobile phone chips catching up, and the performance gap is only about 7% at most, which is not too big.

However, in terms of graphics display, the performance of Texas Instruments' mobile phone processors is simply embarrassing. It was beaten to the ground by Sugon Technology, and the performance gap between them can almost be claimed to be doubled.

Through this scene, the people at the scene also realized the power of the mobile phone's independent graphics chip GPU.

It turns out that after the GPU of the mobile phone processor is independent, it is the same as the discrete graphics card and integrated graphics card on the computer. The performance of the integrated graphics card is simply eye-catching.

Perhaps the ability to display images, animations and videos is the only function of the integrated graphics card. As for better thinking, it still has to fall on the discrete graphics card, and the mobile phone seems to be the same.

So people who realized this, quickly showed crazy eyes.

But soon, their crazy eyes shifted from Ni Guangnan to Lin Chen.

After all, if they remembered correctly, Ni Guangnan just said that Lin Chen's contribution reached more than 60%!

Thinking of this, countless people showed shocked expressions at Lin Chen, and looked at Lin Chen with horror.

At this time, what Lin Chen didn't know was that Galvin, the president of Motorola at the VIP seat, had a very ugly expression on his face.