Scene language skills that college students must know

Chapter 39 Scene 39 - When others ridicule themselves

Chapter 39 Scene 39 - When others ridicule themselves
Chapter 39 Scene 39 - When others ridicule themselves
How do you deal with being teased by others?Some people will be silent, some people will curse, and so on, in fact

, as long as you master the methods and skills of countering other people's sarcasm, you will be calm and able to cope with such a situation

.Here's what to do when you're ridiculed by others: ?
([-]) Transfer inference?

Transfer inference is to answer or counterattack from other aspects to the specific questions raised by others when they ridicule themselves
Methods. ?
The method of transfer inference requires first to have an accurate analysis of the question or argument raised by the other party, and to choose an appropriate angle to carry it out.

Answer or refute; secondly, the answer or refute should be reasonable and witty.Please see the following example: ?

The famous Russian scientist Lomonosov was from a poor family in his childhood. After he became famous, he still lived a simple and monotonous life.

Live, don't pay attention to clothes, insist on studying knowledge every day. ?
One day, an ignorant man who paid attention to food and clothing saw a hole in Lomonosov's clothes, and spoke with a sarcastic tone.

Said sarcastically: "Sir, can you see your knowledge from this hole?" Facing the ridicule, Lomonosov calmly replied
Say, "No, sir, your folly is seen from here."?
Lomonosov's answer, witty transferred the other party's malicious words to the other party, from knowledge to stupidity, turned the other party
Fang retorted speechlessly. ?
([-]) Tit for tat?

That is to say, when the other party ridicules a certain aspect of himself, he also satirizes him in this aspect.The other party teased me about my hairstyle and clothing, I
I must also use his hairstyle and clothing as the target of irony. The other party is happy with my name and name, and I also use his surname to make a fuss.this method

Often can put the other party into a more embarrassing situation. ?
According to legend, when Yu Qian was young, he was quick-witted.One day, his mother combed his hair into three branches, and a monk named Lan Guchun saw it
Said: "The triangle is like a drum stand." Yu Qian countered and said: "A bald one is like a hammer." A Master Shangshu saw that Jin was dressed in green, so he dug it up.

He said bitterly: "Toads out of the water wear green coats." Seeing that the Shangshu was old and dressed in a red robe, Xie Jin immediately replied, "Crabs in the soup are covered with green coats."
red robe. "This kind of tit-for-tat retort can make the other party suffer for themselves and waste all their efforts.?
([-]) Retreat to advance?

In the face of the other party's unfriendly ridicule, you might as well take a step back and admit it, and then use the other party's logic to counter the other party.For example, Darwin

After proposing the theory of biological evolution, Huxley tried his best to support and promote it, so he was cursed by the church as "Darwin's fighting dog".exist
At a debate meeting, when the religious leader saw Huxley stepping into the venue, he cursed: "Be careful, this dog is here again!"
Contemptuously replied: "Yes, thieves are most afraid of hounds with a keen sense of smell!" The subtext is: "Yes, I am a hound,

And you are a thief, and thieves are most afraid of hounds! "This has launched a powerful counterattack against the religious leaders, turning passive into active.

([-]) Contrast counterattack?

Contrastive rhetorical question refers to the regular intersection and logic of putting two opposite or similar things or things together to form pros and cons.

editing crossover.Then grasp the mystery from the intersection and reflect the other party's absurdity in a rhetorical way, so as to make your own correct view

Points appear more distinct and prominent through reasonable foil.Please see the following example: ?

British poet George?Murray was the son of a carpenter, and he was very respected by the British upper class at that time.he never hides himself
This was rare in England at the time. ?
One day, a playboy met him in a salon. The playboy was extremely jealous of the poet and wanted to slander him maliciously. ?
He said to Murray: "Excuse me, is your father a carpenter?"?
The poet replied: "Yes."?
The dude asked maliciously: "Then why didn't your father train you to be a carpenter?"?
Murray immediately realized what he meant, and asked him: "Excuse me, your lord's father must have been a gentleman?"?
The dude said arrogantly: "Yes!"?
Murray immediately countered: "Then why didn't your father raise you to be a gentleman?" The playboy was speechless.

The dandy's question is obviously boring. If the poet gives a positive answer to the boring question of the boring man, wouldn't it be
Getting more and more boring?After all, the poet is a poet. In the positive answer and the rhetorical question, he chose the latter, that is, riding a donkey on the slope.

Fang's logical rhetorical questioning makes the dude shameful, and stealing a chicken will make him lose a handful of rice. ?
([-]) Hit its vitals?

That is, to point out the essence and key points between the opponent's erroneous views and ridicule attacks, using the finishing touch.For example, the Soviet Union

The current Foreign Minister Molotov is a diplomat who was born in the aristocracy. At a meeting of the UN General Assembly, a diplomat from the British Labor Party presented
He attacked and said, "You are from aristocratic background, and my ancestors are miners. Which of us can represent the working class?"
I heard Molotov say calmly: "Yes, but we both became traitors." Molotov's brilliance lies in

He didn't dwell on superficial words, but grasped the substantive issue that each had betrayed the original class, and put the other party in a trap.
into trouble. ?
([-]) Anti-use its meaning?

Reverse meaning refers to when the other party ridicules oneself, take the other party's topic and use it against its meaning, which often puts the other party in a passive situation

.For example, in the early 16th century, Congressman Randolph, a well-known poisonous tongue in the U.S. Congress, had a meeting with his political opponent Crean one day.
The strips meet across the cross-board on the dirt track.Two people set foot on the span at the same time, and the width of the span only allows one person to walk alone.but who

I don't want to give in first.Finally, Kelin spoke first:?
"I will never make way for the villains!"?
Randolph replied: ?

"I often give way to villains!"?
With that said, he stepped off the board and let Kelin walk over. ?
On the surface, Randolph made concessions, but he gave way to the "villain", who was ridiculed instead and had to take the lead
. ?
([-]) Causal analogy?

Counterattack by analogy of cause and effect refers to cleverly borrowing the causal logic context formed by the other party for your own use
, extending the other party's "fruit" as one's own "cause", through the retort of this "cause", and then deriving a new "fruit",
In this way, tit for tat satirizes the other party.Its main feature is to take the other party's "effect" as the "cause" and make full use of the paradox of the previous "cause".

Point to play for the mystery. ?
Bernard Shaw was very thin.Once he went to a small banquet, a fat-headed capitalist deliberately made fun of him, but was treated as
A word from the family is inexhaustible.When the capitalist saw George Bernard Shaw, he said: "Oh, Mr. Bernard Shaw, as soon as I see you, I know
There is a famine in the world right now! " George Bernard Shaw immediately countered: "Well, sir, as soon as I saw you, I knew that there was something going on in the world.
cause of famine. "?
Since thinness is the result of the famine, then the cause and effect of the analogy is naturally: fat is the cause of the famine.The key is
It depends on whether you had the ability to respond quickly and retort at that time, see the causal relationship, and organize your speech in a timely manner.
Word.In the above story, the bored capitalist wanted to ridicule George Bernard Shaw's thinness and poverty, but he did not expect that Bernard Shaw

He is not an ordinary person in terms of language control ability. It is his quick response of causal retort that makes capitalists lift stones

Smashed his own foot. ?
([-]) Reverse comparison?

Reverse comparison is to use the logic of the other party's language to cross-contrast the origin and end of things, or to reverse the logic of the same thing
The cross-comparison of the truth and absurdity makes the positioning of truth and absurdity closer to your point of view in the counterattack method you use.Please read the example below

son:?

The famous Danish fairy tale writer Andersen lived a frugal life and often played in the street wearing a worn-out hat.One guy laughed at him and said:
"What is that thing on your head, can it be considered a hat?"?
Andersen immediately retorted: "What is that thing under your hat? Can it be a head?"?
It is really "the height of the road is one foot, and the height of the devil is one foot".Andersen really deserves to be a great figure, when dealing with the language of those with ulterior motives
In the provocation, he gave full play to his witty logical thinking and speculative ability.He held on tightly to the other party, and it was impossible to speak rudely.
The truth is a mystery, according to the other party's "things" to "respect" the other side's "things", and then use the two things to reverse each other's image

Contrast, make the opponent pale in comparison.Here reverse contrast becomes a powerful weapon against the boring language of the boring.

(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like