Scene language skills that college students must know

Chapter 36 Scene 36 - When dealing with malicious interrogation
Chapter 36 Scene 36 - When dealing with malicious interrogation
In interpersonal communication, some people often question or abuse others in a malicious manner.
Fighting back encourages the spread of evil forces.Therefore, it is necessary to strike back in order to make them realize the mistakes of their actions, and thus
And change course.What should we do in the face of this situation?Here are some tips on how to deal with the other party's malicious questioning or verbal abuse

:?
([-]) Responsively counterattack?
In social situations, you don’t have to blush when the other person becomes angry about a problem, scolds you or attacks you personally
If you scold him thickly, you may hit the opponent's arms.You should stay calm and use appropriate and subtle language techniques
Coincidentally, giving a resolute counterattack tit for tat not only safeguards one's personal dignity, but also confronts the right and wrong involved in the debate.

Don't budge.If you can do this, the opponent will have nothing to do but be completely defeated. ?
For example, when Darwin's theory of evolution had spread, the Church of England held a meeting to besiege the theory of evolution.

On the last day of the meeting, a bishop personally attacked the scientist Huxley in order to save the defeat. He said:?
"Professor Huxley was sitting next to me, and he wanted to tear me to pieces as soon as I sat down, because, according to his beliefs, he

It turned out to be a monkey!However, I would like to ask, did the qualification of this monkey descendant come from his grandfather?

, or did you get it from your grandmother? "?
This is a typical personal attack. The bishop is not discussing a problem, but an attempt to insult the personality of the other party.In this regard, Hersh
Professor Li shot back like this:?
"I affirm—and I repeat my affirmation: that to say that I arose from a wretched, stooped and mentally undeveloped creature, I do not
feel ashamed; on the contrary, to say that I originated from those who claim to be very talented and have a high social status, but meddle in their own ignorance.

People who know things and arbitrarily obliterate the truth are really shameful. "?
In the face of personal attacks, Huxley bravely defended his personal dignity, confronted each other with righteousness and integrity, and responded with justice.
The refutation made the bishop show his original shape of being harsh and indifferent. ?
([-]) Counterattack by analogy?
Sometimes, other people's disagreement with you in a certain aspect is not raised normally, but in a malicious way.

When questioning or attacking, you can make analogies with similar things that the other party is familiar with, and point out their common ground, and the other party will naturally have nothing to say
said. ?
Faraday, the founder of modern magnetism, his discovery opened up a broad road for the application of electricity, so many places invite him
To give lectures on the theory of electromagnetic applications.Once, after Faraday finished his speech, a bourgeois lady intentionally and sarcastically accused
Said: "Professor, what is the use of these things you are talking about?" Faraday retorted calmly: "Madam, can you predict
Is there any use for a newborn baby? "As soon as the words fell, the noble lady walked away resentfully.?
In this way, Faraday responded to the lady's malicious ridicule with a rhetorical question.It is not difficult to see that Faraday's rhetorical question combines many
Well-known common sense, no one can predict the future of a newborn child, no doubt a new theory, of course no one can predict

Know its great effect.It is this rhetorical question that not only satirizes the high degree of ignorance of the lady, but also exposes the bad intentions of the lady

, resulting in a huge attack force. ?
([-]) Insinuating counterattack?
Sometimes, others may attack you personally by pointing fingers and insulting your personality.In this regard, if you ask the right
Fang, fighting back head-on, may be in the opponent's arms, he can say: I didn't point at you, why do you want to talk hard on yourself?
.The best way to fight back against this kind of personal attack is to use the same insinuation, to fight back against the other party, and to gain control over it.
Effect.Please see the following example: ?

A group of people came out of a certain railway station and went to a stall in the station square to buy a few roast chickens to eat during the trip. Among the buyers were men.

There are women, and they are all young.When they bought roast chicken, they said to the female boss: "Hey, you really sell a whole lot at this stall! There are also pheasants.
Well, is your pheasant meat delicious?I didn't expect such a beautiful pheasant to be produced in your place. The meat of this pheasant is so tender!boss
, how to sell it?Can it be delivered to your door? "After finishing speaking, the group of them all laughed contemptuously.?
The female boss knew very well that this group of people had bad intentions and compared herself to a "pheasant". If she directly scolded them a few words, she would be accused of being a
Do business in a civilized manner; if you don't reply with a few words, there may be more embarrassing scenes.So she said neither humble nor humble: "We

There are no pheasants here, only pheasants are processed, and the pheasants here are all transported from other places by train.The pheasants brought in are all live,

So if you don't pay attention, you will be pecked by pheasants. These things are wild animals after all, and they don't understand human nature.When we are processing pheasants,
For those wild pheasants, first cut them with a knife, then scald them with boiling water, then tear off their fur, and open their stomachs when they are hot, and then

It's BBQ.You just ask your two little girls, they just tasted it.If you eat well, welcome

Buy a few more, and I can sell them at a discount. Besides eating for yourself, you can take the extra back to give to your relatives and friends, isn’t it considered a gift for us?

Has the goods arrived yet? "?
Those malicious provocateurs broke into a cold sweat after hearing the impeccable answer, so they forced themselves to say: "Okay! Enough!"
, the proprietress's goods are beautiful, the person is beautiful, and the words are even more beautiful. "After finishing speaking, I really obediently bought a few roast chickens and left. The old man

Banniang just used insinuations and language skills to control concealment, sent back the nickname of "pheasant", and cleverly fought back.
Pointing to the perpetrator of Sang scolding Huai. ?
([-]) Hypothetical counterattack?
Hypothetical counterattack is to use hypothetical reasoning in logic to counterattack the other party's rude questioning.This counterattack
The other party was speechless and had nothing to say. ?
Once, a critic who specialized in carping for details criticized Mark?Twain said: "Why are you lying?"
For this unfounded and rude question, Mark?Twain said: "If you can't tell a lie, if you don't have the ability to tell a lie, then
I cannot be judged to be a liar; only a person with extensive experience in this field would make such a blatant and arbitrary accusation. "?
It's not hard to see, Mark?Twain's refutation uses two hypothetical reasoning, that is, a sufficient conditional hypothetical reasoning and a necessary conditional reasoning
piece of hypothetical reasoning.Although the content of these two reasoning questions omits the minor premise and conclusion, they are still very clear.First
This reasoning uses the negative consequential form of sufficient conditional hypothetical reasoning.That is, if you don't lie, and you don't have the ability to lie, then
It's impossible to judge me for lying, so you will lie, you have the ability to lie.Affirmative

Postpart.That is, only those who have experience in lying will blatantly and arbitrarily accuse others of lying. You blatantly and arbitrarily accuse others of lying.
Others lie, so you are an experienced liar.These two hypothetical reasoning premises are true, the form is correct, and they corroborate each other
, thoroughly exposed the despicable soul of the accuser, and ruthlessly refuted the unreasonable accusation of the real liar, thus showing the indefensible

rebuttal logical force.

([-]) Contrastive counterattack?
When the other party makes accusations or attacks on a certain aspect of you, you can find another opposite thing that the other party does not object to.

Compare, thus pointing out the absurdity of the other party's remarks. ?
At a recital, after Mayakovsky recited his new work, someone immediately asked: "Mayakovsky

, you say you are a collectivist, but you always say "I" and "I" in your poems...why is that? "Maya

Kowski immediately retorted: "Nicholas II is not the same, he always speaks 'we', 'we'... Do you think he

Are you a collectivist? "?
Obviously, the person accused him of not being a collectivist based on the "I" in Mayakovsky's poem.
Vicious heart.However, Mayakovsky used the word "we", but was extremely individualist Nicholas II

As a rebuttal based on theoretical basis, this forms a sharp contrast with what the person accused, thus profoundly expounding whether it is true or not.

Being a collectivist does not depend on the use of words "I" and "we", but on his actual actions.this
It completely refuted the basis of the accuser's accusation, so the accusation also collapsed. ?
([-]) Hidden needle in Mianli to fight back?
When you are attacked, hurt, or humiliated by the other party, you should remain calm and calm.when hitting back,

The tone and attitude can be more relaxed, but the content expressed in it has relatively strong elements.This kind of counterattack with hidden needles
It is often possible to control the strong with softness, thwart the opponent's despicable attacks, and maintain one's personal dignity. ?
For example, the summer night is deep, and many people are still sitting in the square to enjoy the shade.At this time, an astronomer walked slowly towards the square with his back to the sky.
Come, and concentrate on observing the stars in the sky.In front of him was a large and deep pit, which the astronomers did not discover,
I stepped on the air and fell...?
The people around laughed when they saw it, and someone said sarcastically, "Look, the toad fell into the deep pit with its feet up in the sky."
Said: "Bookworm, you claim to know the things in the sky, but you don't know what's under your feet. You have benefited a lot from your research.
, Falling into the pit is the benefit of your knowledge! "Everyone burst into laughter again.?
The astronomer climbed up from the pit, patted the soil on his body, and replied calmly: "Only those who stand tall can stand tall."
Have the right and freedom to fall into a pit from a high place. People without knowledge are like lying in a pit and never crawled out
How can you fall into the pit from above? Everyone was dumbfounded. The astronomer smiled and said, "Tomorrow, there will be

rain. "Sure enough, it really rained the next day.?
Faced with the insulting sarcasm of the crowd, the astronomer did not scold them angrily, but with the wisdom of a scholar
From a shocking philosophical point of view, he calmly countered the ignorance and boredom of the sarcasm.tone and attitude
Gentle, but the edge of the counterattack is extremely sharp.

([-]) Counterattack by reductio absurdum?
Reductio absurdum counterattack is to follow the opponent's accusation and draw absurd conclusions, so as to prove that the opponent's accusation is unreasonable.fight back
The other party's accusations were completely exposed, and the other party's intentions were completely exposed.Here's an example of a counterattack using reductio absurdum:
When Comrade Wang Ruofei was in prison, a reactionary judge asked him viciously: "Marx and Lenin are foreigners.
But you talk about the doctrine of foreigners, isn't this betraying the country? "Facing the enemy's slander, Comrade Wang Ruofei calmly refuted
: "Mr. Judge, you are simply ridiculous, and you are so pathetic that you are ignorant.
surprise.Speaking to you, let's talk about common sense: Marx was a German Jew, he couldn't get a foothold in Germany, he was in

Carried out revolutionary activities in Paris, and later lived in London, England.He participated in the labor movement in the UK, and the British working class welcomed him
.According to you, the British working class sold their country to Marx.According to the truth of Marxism, Lenin

The Bolshevik Party was established in Russia, leading the people to overthrow the reactionary tsarist rule and drive away the German invaders.Is it column
Ning drove out the Germans and sold Russia to the Germans?Mr. Judge, Marxism is the truth of the proletarian revolution.
Develop wherever the country needs.No one can stop it. "It is not difficult to see that Comrade Wang Ruofei used reductio absurdum here to refute

move the judge.Comrade Wang Ruofei’s reductio ad absurdis: If I propagate Marxism in China, according to the judge, I will betray my country.

If so, then Marx joined the labor movement in England and was welcomed by the British workers, who were traitors to the country; Lenin was in Russia
Propagating Marxism and driving away the German invaders, Lenin also betrayed the country, but no one in the UK said that the British workers were traitors

No one in Russia said that Lenin was traitorous, so it can be seen that my propaganda of Marxism in China was not traitorous at all.Thanks to Wang Ruofei
Comrades used the method of reductio absurdum, which not only thoroughly exposed the extremely absurdity of the content of the reactionary judge's accusation, but also thoroughly washed away the reactionary judge's
the charges imposed.

(End of this chapter)