Grandpa's great writer

Chapter 286 Chapter 384 Controversy

Chapter 286 The Three Eighty-Four Controversy
"Take Xiaoqi's experience as an example."

The first story Su Ya told was about a robot called "Xiaoqi". This robot was manufactured in 2034. It was a robot that could only speak some simple languages ​​and was sold as a nanny.

The existence of Xiaoqi triggered a debate between the host and the hostess in the house. The host felt that since there are three laws, it is impossible for a robot to harm humans, but the hostess obviously held a different view. She believed that a machine is a machine. If some of its parts break down one day, it may not be under human control.

And the debate between the hostess and the hostess just reflects the contradictions in the whole society.

One side believes that the robot will strictly follow the procedures and there will be no problems, while the other side believes that the robot is a safety hazard and will threaten human beings.

The chapter "Little Seven" does not tell many stories, and it is not brilliant, but the thinking about the existence of robots revealed in it is very interesting.

But this kind of thinking is not new. Robots have been around for so many years. With the development of science and technology, the technology of robots is getting higher and higher. Thinking and discussions about robots have been going on for many years.

The difference in this book is that the stories told are very small and detailed, so detailed that people think that these things are about to happen to people.

Yute Xinyu rubbed his head. At the end of this chapter, Su Ya mentioned another story about the Mercury Expedition Team, but the novel ends here.

"Ticking people's appetite." Yute Xinyu said with some distress.

……

A sneeze!

Zhang Zhong had just finished taking a shower when he suddenly sneezed.

Maybe someone is missing him.

Before taking a shower, he checked the website, the new book "I, Robot" was uploaded by Chen Qing.

In fact, there are many difficulties in writing this book, and there are many things to be changed.

For example, the character "Xiaoqi" is actually a nanny robot who can't speak in the original book, because there were no robots equipped with voice at that time.

But Zhang Zhong couldn't write like this, because now that robots have developed to this point, most people will know that the difficulty of realizing voice functions and walking functions is much lower than the development of robots' intelligence.

In other words, it is impossible for a robot as smart as "Xiao Qi" to be equipped with a voice function.

Now even if you ask a junior high school student, they should know this.

However, Asimov didn't know that this was not Asimov's fault, but the limitations of the times.

Zhang Zhong recalled that in Liao Zhai, he had a fantasy about space, saying that a person was sent to the sky, and saw the stars in the sky, some of which were like wine cups, and some of which were like wine jugs, which could be pulled down with a stretch of hand.

Is this because the ancient people were stupid, of course not, it's just that the technology was not developed at that time, and they had less information.

The imagination about robot technology in "I, Robot" is limited by the times. What Zhang Zhong wants to do is to remove the traces of this era and keep the most essential parts.

He didn't expect readers to think how exciting the story was, he just wanted all future robot novels to follow these three laws, so that anyone who writes a robot novel will definitely think of "I, Robot".

In fact, the "Three Laws of Robotics" did not quickly gain acceptance.

The next morning, news of Zhang's new book spread.

Zhang Zhong extended his hand into the field of robot novels, and even made a so-called "Three Laws of Robotics".

There are mixed opinions about these three laws.

Some people say that these three laws are interlocking, and it is difficult for robots to escape this logical chain without problems.

But some people say that these three laws are full of loopholes and are simply vulnerable.

"Obviously Zhang Zhong took it for granted and tried to use three laws to solve the problem of robots. These three laws are indeed very interesting at first glance, but when you look closely, you find that there are big flaws. I can say anything casually, and it will make people These three laws are paralyzed. For example, the prisoner must execute the death penalty, but the first of the three laws of robotics proposed by Zhang Zhong is that no one can be harmed, nor can he die. So what should the robot do at this time? According to the three laws, We must save this death row prisoner at all costs."

"Indeed, the flaws of these three laws are too obvious."

"The simplest solution is not to develop intelligent robots. As long as the robots are not intelligent, all problems will not happen."

"Yes, developing AI is simply playing with fire, and eventually humans will definitely be controlled by robots."

"That's right, are there still few novels about robots usurping the throne? Can you be a little bit more interesting, this time Zhang Zhong is playing off."

"It's not too bad if you play it off, it's just a science fiction novel, just read the story."

Just when everyone was discussing that the three laws of robotics were unreliable, Chapter 2 "Ring Dance" of "I, Robot" was released.

In this chapter, readers have seen a scientific idea called "positron brain", that is, the potential difference of positrons can affect the priority of behavior.

It seems that in this way, the three laws have some more sufficient supplements, but this is not enough.

And in this story, the three laws themselves overturned, and the robot that went to mine trapped itself because of the three laws.

Looking at it this way, it seems that Zhang Zhong himself knows that the three laws he wrote are not perfect.

Some people started to speak well of Zhang Zhong.

【Zhang Zhong is not trying to use the three laws to solve all problems. From the current point of view, his novels are more about the discussion of robot ethics. We readers think.And the idea of ​​a positron brain is also very interesting, and it does solve a lot of problems, doesn't it? 】

[Yes, discussion without discussion?In this way, it is correct for everyone to agree on the robot threat theory. 】

[But having said that, the robots in the novel are not very intelligent, they look so stupid. 】

[Indeed, looking at the settings, they seem to be relatively first-generation robots. 】

[This narrative is reminiscent, there should be smarter robots in the future. 】

[In other words, can a robot like Xiaoqi really be built in 2034? 】

[It should be possible, and I feel that the current technology can even make this kind of robot, but there is no way to do it for civilian use. 】

[Come on, the current robots are not very intelligent, they are purely supported by the database, although Xiaoqi may think that it is not intelligent, but it is very bionic, and the current robot level really cannot do it. 】

 I wish you all a happy Qixi Festival

  Today is also the third anniversary of my wife and I’s marriage. I gave her a copy of "It". "Return of the Clown"

  
 
(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like