Lawyer Luo’s live broadcast of popularization of the law, are you acting as a joke player?

Chapter 232 The judge stopped laughing!Werewolf exposes truck in mother-in-law's court!
“This piece of evidence we have produced is based on the preliminary findings made by official investigators during the investigation phase. This is irrefutable evidence!
The man's skin debris was found on the clothes of our plaintiff, the woman!This shows that what happened between the two parties..."

The plaintiff's lawyer sent the last trump card in his hand.

This card is a king bomb.

Under normal circumstances, after playing this card, it can basically be considered that the case can be won.

The plaintiff won the case.

The woman won the case.

The defendant, the man locked inside the fence, lost the case.

but!

In the debate just now, Luo Kai used a program to directly ban one of the opponent's trump cards!
Will this trump card be invalidated again next time?
Everyone expressed great expectations.

Hanging on the huge curtain above the courtroom is a report made by the investigators during the investigation phase.

xx skin debris related identification report
Appraiser: xx.

Practice certificate number: xx
Identification object: The unit area cloth of each node of the clothes worn by the xx victim...

Accused of being skin fragments on the suspect's body, the genetic sequence number recorded and stored by the official...

Inside the wedding room at the crime scene...

Physical evidence was sampled for identification and photographed.

After all, prove where the sample was taken from!

【picture】

【picture】

【picture】

Identification results: The suspect's skin debris was found on the victim's clothing. However, the physical examination of the victim did not find deoxygenation in his body, and it cannot be compared with the perpetrator's registered genetic serial number. match.

The appraiser gave a professional opinion: The two parties may have been intimate with each other as if they were husband and wife, but there are doubts about whether there was any relationship. There are several reasons for this. On the one hand, the victim did not conduct the appraisal until the 5th day. There is Some washing behaviors lead to...

……

The test report was hung on a huge curtain.

The object of this report was the clothes worn by the plaintiff at the scene of the crime, and some were sampled at various nodes.

The man's hair and skin debris were also collected on the spot.

Of course, the process of drawing blood for testing will not be eliminated.

The woman's full body examination report is also attached.

What to check?

The appraisal report produced in this way is more convincing.

The conclusions drawn and the purpose of the test are more relevant.

What is the conclusion?
What did happen between the man and the woman.

Is it voluntary?

It is enough for the woman to claim that she violated the rules of the women's hospital.

evidence?

The most special thing about this one is that the woman can attack by opening her mouth.

Coupled with the official identification of gene-related factors...

It is indeed possible to convict directly to a certain extent.

After all, it is too subjective to judge a woman against her will.

It's like the switch that determines life and death lies in the hands of the plaintiff, the woman.

A gentle word from a woman can put a man in a dilemma of life and death.

If the man can prove his innocence, he will have to go through a lot of hardships.

The time and energy spent by both parties to find evidence and defend themselves is simply disproportionate.

but!

Luo Kai didn't find any difficulty.

Even what the opponent has been doing is expected.

Ah!
This female lawyer's current performance is even weaker than Lawyer Luo's previous performance in the law firm and in the simulated courtroom with the law firm owner...! ?

Yes!

Luo Kai seemed to have overestimated this female lawyer.

But it doesn't matter.

Whether it's slapping mosquitoes to death or hitting them with a cannon.

The fate of mosquitoes is the same, that is, death without burial.

my opponent.

I think you are too strong.

But I didn't expect that you would be so weak during the court debate.

For example, for the inspection of the most important key evidence, there was no repeated preparation work.

Even his own client is cheating his own lawyer.

tsk tsk!
The couple, the plaintiffs and parties in this case, were quite convincing.

Key evidence was edited privately, rendering the evidence unusable.

In such a serious situation, as an attorney, I didn't get any information.

tsk tsk!
It's like a pig teammate met a c-position with average strength!
Yes!

General strength.

Professional quality is average.

For example, just now, I almost failed to control my emotions and broke my defense.

It's downright ridiculous.

Now after several rounds of debate.

After several rounds of fierce confrontation.

Luo Kai serves as the defense lawyer for the defendant, that is, the man.

It can be felt that the balance of victory has rapidly tilted towards the defendant.

The current victory-loss ratio between the two sides is about 6:4.

The probability of Luo Kai winning the lawsuit is 6.

The probability of losing the case is 4.

Luo Kai does not feel that reaching this point in the lawsuit is his limit.

Because there is still a little bit left.

during the ensuing debate.

Increase your chances of winning directly.

Directly reverse the situation.

Turn defeat into victory.

create a miracle.

……

“The evidence cited by the plaintiff in court is an appraisal report produced by a professional appraisal agency.

The purpose of the plaintiff's use of this evidence is to explain what happened to both the plaintiff and the defendant. Then the plaintiff, the victim, claims that the woman was violated against her will during the process.

The defendant, the defendant's defense lawyer, Lawyer Luo, is now coming to your side for debate and cross-examination!Please present your defense opinions and rebuttal reasons in court! "

Boom!
After the presiding judge finished speaking, he knocked the wooden hammer in his hand.

Everyone was staring at the man sitting in the dock.

Rocky!

How will the debate be conducted next?
Will procedural methods be used to exclude this key evidence?

Or will there be a debate on the questionable qualifications of the appraisal agency?

This fight between words.

We were going back and forth, and the fight was very enjoyable.

A battle of wits over IQ.It was simply enjoyable for the people present to watch.

Otherwise, why are so many people obsessed with intellectual games like chess? !

This case has reached its final moment.

The defendant (male), who was locked inside the fence, had tears in his eyes and his face was full of grief and anger.

But although she shed tears, she did not cry out.

Crying would disrupt the order of the court.

And he can also let his enemies witness all this.

This is impossible.

Who said that a man does not flick his tears easily?
Just not to the point of being sad.

It’s just that I have never experienced the grievance and anger accumulated after being imprisoned for more than 100 days!

It's just that I have never experienced it, and I will almost bear the notoriety of rape for the rest of my life.

I just haven’t experienced the experience of my parents’ life savings being almost defrauded by a fairy dance scam.

If you go through this.

In court, grievances can be cleared up openly.

Under such circumstances.

Who can control it?

Who can hold on?
Of course, Luo Kai would not disappoint his client's pleading eyes.

It is a habit to press the microphone down a little, so that your voice can be better recorded!
Luo Kai took a deep breath and spoke calmly and slowly, but with a loud and powerful voice: "As for the evidence presented by the plaintiff's lawyer in court, we feel that the probative power of this evidence is not consistent with the plaintiff's claims. Use this evidence To prove that women are against their will, I don’t think there is any reason! Here are a few points I am prepared to refute!”

Luo Kai slowly listed a few points that he had already prepared: "One: In the appraisal opinions, the official case handlers hired professional appraisal institutions to conduct appraisals during the investigation stage. The appraisal results and the final opinions of the appraisal experts are as everyone As you can see, skin debris of our defendant was indeed found in the test samples, but what does this prove?

I think the only thing that can be proved is that the plaintiff and the defendant had contact, but it was only for normal contact. Just like in the elevator surveillance evidence I submitted before, the plaintiff and the defendant had some intimacy in the elevator after they got engaged. Skin flakes from the South can be detected in the test sample, I think this is normal!

It cannot directly prove that the defendant committed a criminal act against the plaintiff in one step. We can fully and clearly explain that the reason why this evidence appears on the test sample cloth is caused by normal life behavior!Rather than a criminal act! "

"If this can directly lead to a conclusion of crime, then the participants in this case, you can cut off pieces of cloth from your clothes and use them for testing. You may have skin fragments that others do not know how to fall away not far away. Crumbs!
So I think this is a point that needs to be raised and discussed, and it is also a point of doubt! "

Luo Kai clarified the truth directly here.

Generally in similar cases, the defendant, that is, the man, cannot explain or understand why the woman’s test sample has her own skin debris!

Thus.

Then the possibility of the man being found guilty is infinitely increased.

But in this case at the scene.

Luo Kai has already explained this point clearly.

And produced evidence.

Under surveillance cameras.

In the elevator, the plaintiff and defendant were indeed as close as a couple and had normal daily contact.

So there is no fuss about detecting this point.

At the end, he even gave an example based on the participants in the litigation themselves.

Quite convincing.

Everyone present nodded slightly after hearing this.

Luo Kai continued: "Two: In the appraisal report, the appraisal expert also made it clear that the woman had a full-body physical examination on the first day after reporting the crime, that is, the fifth day after the incident. No xx was found. I think this point is very clear and correct!

Since no deoxygenation has been found, it means that we have not implemented it, and it does not constitute a criminal act at all! "

"So to sum up, our defendant did not commit a criminal act and had no criminal intent. Objectively and subjectively, there are no elements of the crime of rape. Therefore, our defendant is not guilty!" Luo Kai said Take a deep breath here.

All the previous debate points were summarized and summarized to form a complete debate logic:

“The focus of this case is divided into two points. Objectively speaking, there is no direct evidence between the two parties, and the woman can’t produce evidence to prove that she has suffered a painful experience!
Subjectively, the focus of the dispute is whether the woman's will was violated. As a defense lawyer, during the debate just now, I looked at three aspects: the possibility of the man committing the crime, whether he has the ability to continue the crime, and whether the woman was voluntary at the time. Explain and demonstrate!

It was also submitted in court that during the painful process of what she claimed to be an encounter with 18 levels of hell, the woman actually ordered the perpetrator a pork rib soup with wolfberry added to replenish physical strength!
He did not flee the scene, and even hummed happily with an expression on his face. These supporting evidences can be testified by the delivery boy and the delivery platform!

The plaintiff has not yet given a logical answer that is consistent with ordinary people!

As for the focus of subjective will, we have objective evidence to prove it, and these evidences form a complete chain of evidence!
From an objective and subjective point of view, according to a principle stipulated in the law, when there is doubt about the evidence, it should be in favor of the defendant. Our defendant is not guilty. If he is guilty, please ask the plaintiff to provide more direct, clear, reasonable and legal evidence. The evidence in court Speak, our statement is complete! "

After Luo Kai finished speaking.

The whole place was silent.

This has already covered the next presentation phase.

Especially for the plaintiff to present evidence in court.

This appraisal report.

Luo Kai split it bit by bit.

Counterattack head on bit by bit.

The logic is clear and the language is clear.

Especially in the focus of subjective conflicts between the two parties, is it against the wishes of the woman?

In this extremely subjective statement, Lawyer Luo was able to produce evidence.

Objective evidence.

There are witnesses.

Monitoring and delivery boy's orders were brought directly to him.

Violating a woman's will is not just based on the plaintiff, that is, the family's words after the woman's mouth touched.

He needs evidence.

Luo Kai took out these evidences to form evidence.

perfect.

debate.

It's almost amazing after hearing it.

The three judges listened carefully.

They discussed quietly for a few minutes.

In the end, one of the judges made the final conclusion: "In this piece of evidence, the opinions given by the appraisal agency are not direct enough, but there are ambiguities. According to the principle of favoring the defendant when in doubt..."

Everyone held their breath, and the plaintiff's lawyer clenched his fists subconsciously.

The judge was about to speak.

The mother-in-law, who was sitting on the plaintiff's table, slammed the table: "Bullshit! Everyone is talking bullshit!"

boom!
A huge sound instantly echoed throughout the court.

Judge:? ? ?
Defendant:! ! !

Luo Kai:? . ?
Other bystanders:…

What kind of evil is happening?

Everyone looked over.

The plump mother-in-law wiped her face viciously: "Your honor, I think what you said is wrong. You are all talking nonsense!"

This plump mother-in-law flipped over the table in court.

A spicy energy.

Plus that greasy and plump face.

It makes people feel sick.

The mother-in-law said fiercely: "According to the law, my daughter has suffered such great harm. He said that against a woman's will is against a woman's will. Even if it was followed at the time, it can still be withdrawn now!

What about the defendant behind bars?You can't escape today no matter what, let me pay you earlier..."

The mother-in-law said viciously.

The people at the scene suddenly fell into silence.

The judge took a deep breath.

Good guy.

Werewolf exposes truck?

Blackmail?

Dare you say it so openly?
(End of this chapter)