You became a lawyer and sent the judge in?

Chapter 359 No evidence? Apply directly for judgment!

Wan Xiangdong's statement requires direct evidence.

According to his meaning, that is.

If Huang Xuemei does not explain the specific details of this case.

Then this case cannot prove that Huang Xuemei is a criminal.

But in fact, what the prosecutor accepted was side evidence.

That is, the source and whereabouts of chemical poisons, as well as various side facts, to accuse them.

Su Bai raised his hand to indicate that he wanted to supplement his accusation, and after getting the consent of the presiding judge.

Su Bai looked at the defendant's attorney's seat and the defendant's client.

"According to the statement of the lawyer appointed by the defendant, the confessions of Huang Xuemei and Zhu Yun's roommates cannot be used as a condition for determining intentional subjectivity in this case."

"The highly toxic chemicals Huang Xuemei stole from the laboratory cannot be used as the main evidence for prosecution."

"Then I would like to ask the defendant Huang Xuemei about this entire act."

"Why did you steal the chemical poison from the laboratory?"

Huang Xuemei was silent for a few seconds, with calm eyes and no trace of panic.

"I stole the highly toxic chemicals from the laboratory because I wanted to do experiments."

"Doing an experiment? What experiment? Do you have any finished product you can show?"

"No, I took the chemicals out of the laboratory and accidentally lost them on the way to campus."

"I don't know why I can't find it."

Regarding Huang Xuemei's answer, Su Bai continued: "It was lost in your statement."

"But the surveillance on campus showed that you put chemicals into your backpack. Through surveillance and time calculation, you brought the chemicals directly into the dormitory."

"And...the corresponding chemical components were detected in Zhu Yun's cups and toiletries."

"How do you explain this?"

Facing Su Bai's question, Huang Xuemei shook her head:

"I don't know, I don't know what happened. The first time I returned to the dormitory, I saw that the chemicals in my schoolbag were missing."

"To be honest, all the suspicions regarding the poisoning are on me, but I didn't do it."

"I can't explain it."

"Is it because you don't know how to explain it, or is it because you did it and you don't want to admit it?"

Faced with Su Bai's inquiry, Huang Xuemei retorted directly:

"You can't accuse me unfairly!"

"I don't want to admit it, I just want to say that I didn't do it."

"Moreover."

"Is there any coincidence in this? There is definitely a coincidence."

"Just because I took chemicals from the laboratory does not mean that I used the chemicals for poisoning."

"Maybe someone else is jealous of Zhu Yun and puts these things in her cups and toiletries."

"You can't just pin this crime on me, right?"

"If there is evidence, I can definitely plead guilty, but there is no evidence now!"

"What you said are all speculations, but there is no actual evidence to prove that I was the one who poisoned me."

"Although the relationship between Zhu Yun and I is not good, I also admit that I am a little jealous of her."

"But jealousy is jealousy. I can't poison her just for this reason, right?"

"This makes absolutely no sense..."

"And the above evidence is completely unable to prove that I was the one who poisoned the person."

"Did anyone see me poisoning Zhu Yun's toiletries?"

"not at all!"

"So I think the questions you asked, Zhu Yun's attorney, are not necessary for me."

"I have not done any of these things and I will not admit that I have done any of these things."

"Presiding Judge, I advocate for the defendant's legal rights and request Zhu Yun's attorney to stop questioning me."

It must be said that Huang Xuemei's response was very fast, and her opposition measures were also very fierce.

From the point of view of the statement just made, Huang Xuemei's statement makes some sense.

In criminal law, it is up to the prosecutor and public prosecutor to present relevant evidence, and criminal suspects cannot be allowed to prove their innocence.

Huang Xuemei's statement just now was also based on the fact that she could not prove her innocence on her own.

To put it bluntly - I still seize the key point that there is no direct evidence to refute.

It can be said.…

Huang Xuemei's statement can completely defend herself.

Or.…

Before poisoning, Huang Xuemei had read the relevant provisions of the domestic criminal law and was prepared to exonerate herself from the crime of poisoning.

after all.…

As a student of Beidu University, I can learn certain legal knowledge very quickly.

Although it is said that one cannot be proficient, one can still understand the interpretation of a certain crime.

In fact.

When Huang Xuemei decided to poison her at the beginning, she had already prepared a way to deal with it.

Otherwise...it is impossible for the prosecutor to fail to investigate direct evidence.

It is also impossible for her to always prove her innocence during the interrogation by law enforcement and prosecutors.

Even if all criminal suspects are pointed at her, she has expressed one point of view: innocence.

why?

Because she also knew very well in her heart that if she did not plead guilty, she would have the possibility of being exonerated.

If you plead guilty, you will most likely be sentenced to death with a suspended sentence.

After Huang Xuemei finished speaking, she glanced at Su Bai.

The two looked at each other.

Su Bai could see that there was an inexplicable and indescribable psychology in Huang Xuemei's eyes.

It seemed that she was determined not to be found guilty in this trial.

The current clues and evidence point to all suspicions pointing to Huang Xuemei.

But how to judge without direct evidence?

Side evidence is that Huang Xuemei stole chemicals from the laboratory and brought them into the dormitory.

The whereabouts of the chemicals left behind were the poisoning carried out by Huang Xuemei.

There is no intuitive objective fact to prove this.     So is there any other way?

There are also!

"Presiding judge, I disagree with Huang Xuemei's application to reject it."

"I did not infringe on the defendant's legal rights, so the defendant's application to reject the application has no factual basis."

At the trial table, Sun Zhengping looked up at Su Bai and then at Huang Xuemei.

In fact... Sun Zhengping also knew it very well.

Judging from the current defense situation, it is difficult to accuse Huang Xuemei of committing a crime through direct evidence.

Especially when the defendant and the lawyer appointed by the defendant refuse to plead guilty.

And they have been using direct evidence as a reason for evasion to dismiss the prosecution's charges.

but.…

Huang Xuemei's application to Su Bai not to question her again has no legal basis.

Direct rejection is possible.

The hammer struck, and Sun Zhengping spoke: "The defendant applied to reject the statement and inquiry of the lawyer appointed by the prosecution."

"The attorney appointed by the prosecution did not violate any legal provisions during the inquiry."

"The defendant's application is therefore rejected."

"The prosecution has appointed a lawyer. Is there anything else you would like to make a statement?"

Facing the presiding judge's inquiry, Su Bai spoke:

"Yes, Judge."

"I would also like to ask the defendant, do you think you did not poison yourself, but now all the evidence points to you."

"You refuse to plead guilty, don't you?"

Regarding the refusal of the presiding judge, Huang Xuemei didn't have much experience and said calmly:

"It's not that I refused to plead guilty, but that I didn't poison Zhu Yun at all."

"Ok."

Su Bai nodded and looked up at the trial seat: "Presiding Judge."

"According to the current situation of this case, Huang Xuemei refuses to admit that she poisoned Zhu Yun."

"But based on the confession of his roommate and the evidence currently available."

"Our analysis of the current situation is as follows:"

"According to the confession of her roommate, Huang Xuemei once said that she wanted to kill Zhu Yun."

"Whether this is a joke or not, it already shows Huang Xuemei's hostility towards Zhu Yun."

"There is one thing the prosecution has not stated in this case."

"That means Huang Xuemei and Zhu Yun submitted their positions to the same company."

"Zhu Yun was admitted, but Huang Xuemei was not admitted, from this perspective."

"Will Huang Xuemei have a deeper grudge against Zhu Yun?"

"definitely will!"

"Because this is a normal person's thinking. If someone he hates gets his position, he will definitely have some complaints."

"This is normal legal reasoning."

"Another point is that not long after Zhu Yun was admitted, Huang Xuemei went to the laboratory and stole chemical poisons."

"According to Huang Xuemei, she did it for herself."

"But Huang Xuemei did not specifically state what experiment to do or how to do it."

"As a member of the laboratory, Huang Xuemei doesn't know how harmful the experiments on highly toxic chemicals are?"

"If you don't pay attention to highly toxic chemicals during experimental operations, they will pose a huge threat to your health."

"As a member of an institution of higher learning and a staff member in a laboratory, Huang Xuemei should know this very well."

"Is it necessary to conduct experiments without the protection of the laboratory?"

"There's absolutely no need for that."

"What's more, if you want to conduct experiments privately, you can also apply to the school."

"So from this perspective, there is a huge possibility that Huang Xuemei is lying."

"Another point is that Huang Xuemei said that the highly toxic chemicals were lost by her."

“The loss of a highly toxic chemical has a huge impact, and the school is likely to hold individuals accountable.”

"Huang Xuemei first stole highly toxic chemicals from the laboratory, and then claimed that she had lost them..."

"She knew the effects of highly toxic chemicals and the dangers to personal physical harm. Why didn't she search for them as soon as they were lost?"

"Or why not report it to the school?"

"Judging from the above, there are various logical problems in Huang Xuemei's statement."

"It cannot be confirmed from legal grounds or objective facts."

"His self-justifying claims cannot be objectively confirmed."

"based on above."

"Whether it is from the objective facts or the subjective legal situation, it can be shown that Huang Xuemei's theft of highly toxic chemicals in the laboratory was not for experimental purposes."

"The statement itself is just an excuse."

"On this point, I apply for a ruling to reject Huang Xuemei's statement."

At the trial, although Huang Xuemei could not be allowed to prove that she had not committed any crime.

However, her confession may not be accepted by the court.

According to Huang Xuemei's confession just now, she said she lost the chemicals she brought out from the laboratory?

Is it logical?

It does not conform to the relevant logic!

Relying on the directness of time and monitoring from the laboratory to the dormitory.

It can be directly determined that the chemicals in Huang Xuemei's bag were not lost, but were brought to the dormitory by Huang Xuemei.

As for Huang Xuemei...she can still insist that the chemicals are lost.

But she has no evidence.

So on this point of determination, the presiding judge can definitely determine that Huang Xuemei brought chemicals into the dormitory.

Got through this step...

Then this case takes a big step forward.

At least it further aggravated Huang Xuemei's suspicion.

As for Huang Xuemei, she keeps repeating that there is no direct evidence to prove that she was poisoned.

But in fact...she didn't poison her, so why did she bring highly toxic chemicals into the dormitory?

Where did the highly toxic chemicals go?

Can Huang Xuemei give a reasonable explanation?

Can't give it!

why?

Because the person who poisoned Zhu Yun was Huang Xuemei!

The existing side evidence chain has pointed to Huang Xuemei!

Escape...?

Basically impossible! .

....

PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~

(End of this chapter)