You became a lawyer and sent the judge in?

Chapter 326 The Supreme People’s Procuratorate responds!Not guilty!
Fang Rufeng's case is in court.

Su Bai repeatedly emphasized that the "search vocabulary problem" is not an objective fact.

At least it is not a preparatory fact with criminal intent.

The presiding judge is also willing to listen to opinions at court hearings.

But what?The results of it?
The presiding judge considered the case entirely from Xie Tingting's perspective based on his own understanding of the law.

how to say.…

To say that the referee was perverse is a bit of an understatement, because the result has not yet been announced.

And the wrongful judgment does not mean that the judgment is wrong, which means the wrongful judgment.

It requires subjective intentionality.

At present, it is definitely not feasible to submit a wrongful judgment to supervisory review.

But the fact is that there is something wrong with this judgment!

Including related judgments, there are also big problems!
This case has gone through the Provincial High Court and applied for retrial.

If you continue, you can only submit relevant applications to the Supreme Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate.

Judging from the current results, Su Bai can only ask the Supreme Review for guidance on this case.

Otherwise, the subsequent process will be a lot of trouble.

But then again.

Just now, Su Bai directly asked Fang Rufeng to terminate his status as a client lawyer at the court hearing.

According to Lin Fengru, this is indeed a legal loophole.

But the law is when it comes to making this.

This issue has already been considered.

Why do you say that?

Because the identity of the lawyer to be released is determined by the client.

And it cannot be lifted multiple times. If it is lifted twice, the court can appoint an assisting lawyer.

Or it may be refused based on relevant regulations.

And the parties involved were also involved, deliberately obstructing the order of the trial.

Of course, in the interpretation of law, intention is divided into a series of conditions such as subjectivity and objectivity.

The first time can be said to be subjective and problematic for this case.

But if it continues a second time and a third time, then it is obvious that from an objective fact perspective, multiple times has been equivalent to "intentional".

Then again, unless there are special circumstances.

Generally, no lawyer will ask the client to terminate his status as a lawyer-client in court.

Of course, it is also a right granted by law to directly remove a lawyer's client's ID card during a court hearing.

It can only be said to be a strategy and emergency measure. Under normal circumstances, it will not have any impact on the judgment.

How to judge, or how to judge.
.
....
Looking at Li Xuezhen, Su Bai said:
"First report it, then go back to the law firm and prepare to submit the case to the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme Court for guidance."

"I'll sign another entrustment agreement later and do it in your name."

Upon hearing the report, Li Xuezhen's eyes lit up: "Okay, Lawyer Su!"

"But in this trial...the collegial panel and the presiding judge did something wrong."

"But if we go to report it, will the report be successful?"

Thinking of this, Li Xuezhen couldn't help but feel worried.

"Ahem..."

"It doesn't matter whether the report can be successful or not, what we have to do is report it first and then talk about it!"

"If you don't report it, you will never be successful in reporting it, but if you report it, there is still a possibility, do you understand?"

"understand!"

Li Xuezhen nodded seriously with a small face.

Su Bai looked at Li Xuezhen with a hint of satisfaction in her eyes.

For this report, to be honest...from the current point of view, the evidence available is insufficient.

But what if something really happens?
Submit a report.

At least the relevant staff will investigate and understand whether there have been other influences and interference on this case.

Are there any other cases of unfair judgments?
.
....
At Bai Jun Law Firm, during the suspension of the trial, Su Bai took Li Xuezhen back to the law firm first.

Immediately afterwards, I contacted Nandu Media.

That is to say, the previous release of "To Judge or Not to Judge?"The media titled "Crime Preparation, Is It a Double-Edged Sword".

I called the editor-in-chief of Nandu Media.

After the other party connected, Su Bai spoke straightforwardly:
"I also have a piece of case information here that is relatively popular. I wonder if the media would be interested in it?"

As the editor-in-chief, Wang Xue smiled and said after receiving a call from Su Bai:
"You must be interested, Lawyer Su, of course we are interested in your case!"

"Row!"

"Wait a minute, I'll send you the title and content. Just send it under the previous title."

"Okay Lawyer Su, happy to work with you."

After hanging up the phone, Su Bai sent the previously compiled content to Wang Xue.

Then he took Lin Xuezhen to submit to the relevant departments of the Supreme People's Procuratorate a legal interpretation of the crime preparation, as well as the Linsha County Basic Court's relevant judgment on the case.

Why submit the relevant judgment to the Supreme People’s Procuratorate?
It is because there is “evidence” based on the presiding judge’s concept in this case.

Fang Rufeng searched and killed his cheating wife and mistress. Is this search considered an objective preliminary fact?

Since the presiding judge wants to make this decision, let the Supreme Prosecutor make the decision!
Just like the previous supporting cases and self-defense cases.

The Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme Court paid considerable attention to these two cases.

and.…

Relevant guidance was given.

This case is as popular and decisive as the supporting cases and self-defense cases.

If there is any dispute, then let the Supreme People's Procuratorate provide relevant guidance.

To put it bluntly, he just went to the Supreme Prosecutor's Office to ask for an explanation.
.
....
Nandu Media, Wang Xue is reviewing and sorting out the completed content.

After the review is completed.

Published to relevant accounts with the title——

"Follow-up: When integrating real-life scenarios and colliding with legal evidence, should the legal evidence be the main one, or should the evidence be the main one? 》

Looking at the content that had been published, Wang Xue smiled with satisfaction.

In these few times of cooperation with Su Bai, the performance assessment originally scheduled above has been completed!
This video is completely overachieved!
Not bad!

Under Wang Xue's instruction, this video and the previous video with a double-edged sword were all pinned to the top.

soon--

Driven by the previous popularity, the number of views of this video has skyrocketed again.

And the video content this time is mainly discussion.

Whether the presiding judge may not rely on relevant evidence during trial.

Instead, the judgment will be based on legal reasons and the priority between the two.

Why discuss this topic?

Because Lin Fengru’s main concept of judgment is to follow legal principles.

Can we follow legal principles in civil matters?

you can!

A high degree of probability means a judgment based on legal principles.

What about criminal matters?

Rely mainly on factual evidence.If the victims and defendants involved in criminal cases are sentenced in accordance with their legal rights, the impact will be huge.

So...this case is not just a judgment issue, but also a guidance issue.

Because there has been no similar guidance case before.

Perhaps Luo Daxiang also saw this and found Su Bai and entrusted the case.

There is also a lot of discussion on this topic on the Internet, which is basically divided into two categories.

One category is that what is the verdict if there is no evidence?
It’s a completely blind judgment!
There is also a group of people who believe that the presiding judge may have a relatively far-sighted view, have certain experience, and make good judgments.

The two sides had a heated discussion on this.
.
....
When the court hearing was suspended, in a community in Linsha County.

Xie Tingting was talking to Xu Xia on the phone at home.

"Lawyer Xu..."

"Many days have passed since the last time the trial was suspended in our case..."

"When will Fang Rufeng's crime be sentenced?"

"Also...the divorce case will go to trial in two days. If the verdict is not found by then, will there be any impact?"

Xu Xia smiled and said: "It does have a certain impact, but don't worry."

"To be on the safe side, I have applied for an extension in the divorce case."

"Okay, thank you Lawyer Xu, but I am still worried. The trial of Fang Rufeng has been postponed. Will there be any bad consequences?"

"No, in the courtroom, everything must be based on the judgment of the presiding judge."

"You can search for Su Bai online. He is one of the top criminal lawyers in the country. He is very good at court trials."

"As long as it is a court case that can be found, the winning rate is almost 100%, but what about this case?"

"Look at how good this lawyer Su was at the trial?"

"Is it useful? It's not useful at all!"

"You still have to listen to the presiding judge in court. Don't worry, there will be no problem."

"Oh, good."

Xie Tingting hung up the phone, and a man hugged Xie Tingting from behind: "Why has this divorce case been postponed again?"

Xie Tingting turned around: "What, can't wait any longer?"

"Is there any difference between me being with you now and being divorced or not?"

"I think you are just thinking about your property!"

"No way, don't I want us to have a legal identity?"

The man's mouth seemed to be covered with honey, and Xie Tingting seemed to like this very much.

After listening, I didn't care about anything anymore, I just kept saying, hurry up, hurry up.
.
....
the other side.

While the trial was suspended, the three members of the collegial panel responsible for Fang Rufeng's case.

They all had different ideas about this case, and the female judge was particularly dissatisfied with the suspension of the trial.

"Is there any point in this case being released from the commission to postpone the trial?"

“It can’t affect the outcome of the verdict!”

"The outcome of this case has already been decided. It's just that the defendant wanted to delay the case for a little while. After all, it's a retrial."

"I think we should urge Fang Rufeng's case to be heard again as early as possible."

"Otherwise, procrastinating is not an option..."

Lin Fengru nodded after hearing the female judge's suggestion:
"I will supervise and pay attention to this case."

Another male judge who was also in the collegial panel fell silent again when faced with the exchange between the female judge and Lin Fengru.

It's not that he doesn't want to refute...it's that his refutation doesn't make any sense.

He can only express his views in the judgment and the determination of the judgment.
.
....
at the same time.

After Nandu Media released the highly controversial discussion, public opinion hot spots began to gradually rise.

Because the content of the discussion involves the presiding judge’s court hearing authority and the most concerned matter——

Should he be found guilty in this case?

And then there's-

He just said, "I'm going to kill you, and I will search to see if I will be sentenced to death if I kill you." Can this be used as evidence?
The quarrel between the two groups intensified.

There are even some deviations. The people who deviate mainly start from the perspective of women.

Agree with Lin Fengru's opinion - "If it happens."

On the other hand, those on the other side are relatively rational and start the discussion from reality - "There are no ifs."

Of course, there are also many big figures in the legal circle who have spoken out and believe that it should not be used as evidence in court trials.

And called on the Supreme People's Procuratorate to give a guiding answer.

The application for guidance from the Supreme People's Procuratorate has attracted many tags, and this topic has also become a hot search topic.
.
....
Highest inspection.

In fact, there is relevant public attention in every department.

Cases that the Supreme People's Procuratorate sometimes labels as important cases of the year are public opinion cases that attract attention.

And then provide certain guidance and demonstration effects on these public opinion cases that have received relatively high attention.

in an office.

The staff submitted a hot topic.

"Director Li...there has been a hot case on the Internet recently, and public opinion has been loud."

"This is the relevant content that I have compiled. Director Li, please take a look."

"it is good."

Director Li took over the relevant content, glanced at it, and then said: "I will discuss this case with other leaders."

"Give relevant guidance."
.
....
After the others left, Director Li looked at the information again and muttered silently: "Isn't this nonsense?"

"How can a criminal case be decided if it is not based on evidence?"

"It completely violates the sentencing procedure of criminal cases!"

Soon, there was an internal discussion and it was agreed that there were certain problems with the trial of the case.

And directly provided relevant guidance on the case.

——The content involved in the Fang Rufeng case itself did not reach the level of objectively carrying out criminal preparatory actions.

No matter from Fang Rufeng’s words or actions.

They can only conclude that Fang Rufeng has a criminal consciousness in terms of subjective intentions.

There are no objective preparatory conditions.

During the trial, the judges may also use unknown and foreseeable behaviors to plan legal scenarios for the case.

Any situation that is inconsistent with the available evidence should not be accepted.
.
....
It can be said that the guidance given by the Supreme People's Procuratorate is very clear and clear.

Just point to your nose and say, how did you handle this case?

How was it judged?

In Bai Jun's law firm, Su Bai watched the Supreme People's Procuratorate provide guidance on the case.

Smiling slightly, isn't this argument enough?
With the guidance of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, aren't there basically no other possibilities for this case?
The guidance issued by the Supreme People's Procuratorate is generally the most objective and practical.

If the court is held again and does not follow this guidance, it will be equivalent to saying that the judgment was perverted.

Following this guidance, it would directly prove Fang Rufeng's innocence.

In any case, the explanation is now settled.

"Waiting for the trial!"

Su Bai muttered in his heart.

On the other side, Li Xuezhen is also looking forward to another court hearing.

Bad trial?
Are you still going to judge?
Send it in, send it all in!
Beautiful!
Xiao Li's face was filled with an expression of satisfaction.
.
....
PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~
(End of this chapter)