Lawyer

Chapter 132
Why!There are too many incomprehensible things in this world, especially the matters between men and women, which cannot be viewed from the perspective of normal people.

"Let's present evidence and cross-examination. The plaintiff will present evidence." After the female judge finished speaking, she began to look through the evidence submitted by the plaintiff.

"The first piece of evidence, the record of the third person transferring money to the defendant through a bank account, proves that the third person donated 15 yuan to the defendant in succession over five years without the plaintiff's knowledge.

The second piece of evidence is the QQ and WeChat chat records between the third person and the defendant, which were provided to the plaintiff by the third person, proving that there was an improper relationship between the third person and the defendant for as long as five years.

The proof is over. " said the plaintiff's lawyer.

"The defendant cross-examined." The female judge said.

"The authenticity of the above evidence is accepted by the defendant. But the purpose of the proof is not approved. The money earned by the third party to the defendant is not a gift, but to pay living expenses. The cross-examination is over." Fang Yi said.

"The third person cross-examined." The female judge said.

"I agree with all the plaintiff's evidence. It's over." The third person said.

"The defendant presents evidence." The female judge was also annoyed. She didn't want to hear such cases, especially for such a young judge who was not yet married. If she accepted such negative information, it would affect her view of marriage.

Except for her, there are all old judges in their 40s and [-]s, and most of them are female judges. Basically, they are all married and have children. They are obviously more experienced than her in handling such cases.There was a young male judge who was assigned to the court before, and later applied to be transferred to the executive court. Now she is the only young man in the court.

"The first piece of evidence is the QQ and WeChat chat records between the defendant and the third party. The defendant has repeatedly asked the third party for money to pay the rent and daily expenses of the two. The time when the third party transferred money to the defendant provided by the plaintiff is consistent with the two parties The time of the chat records matches, which proves that the third party in this case transferred money to the defendant for the two people to live together.

The second piece of evidence is the defendant's rental contract and the bank transfer records of rent payment. During the cohabitation period between the defendant and the third person, they both rented the same property, and the two parties signed the contract once a year.Because the time is too long, the defendant can only find three lease contracts, but the rent paid is continuous, and the defendant will pay rent to the owner's bank account every year.Prove that the amount and time of the rent paid by the defendant for leasing the property coincides with the amount and time of the payment made by the third party to the defendant, and most of the money paid by the third party to the defendant is used to pay the rent.

The third piece of evidence, the chat records before the defendant broke up with the third person, proves that all expenses during the cohabitation period between the defendant and the third person were borne by the third person.

The fourth piece of evidence is the QQ and WeChat chat records and transfer records of the third party borrowing money from the defendant.The borrowed money was used to refuel vehicles and treat friends to dinner, etc., totaling more than 6000 yuan.Prove that there is an account transaction between the third party and the defendant, and the money transferred from the third party to the defendant is not a gift, including cohabitation expenses and repayment of arrears.

The above chat records are all notarized by the notary public.The proof is over. "Fang Yi said.

"The plaintiff cross-examines evidence," said the female judge.

"The first piece of evidence is the QQ and WeChat chat records between the defendant and the third party. The plaintiff recognizes the authenticity, relationship, and legitimacy of the evidence, but the purpose of the proof is not. The money is specially used to pay daily expenses. If it is really used to pay daily expenses, the third party can definitely pay on behalf of the defendant, and there is no need to go around.

The second piece of evidence is the defendant's rental contract and the bank transfer records of rent payment. The plaintiff believes that this evidence has nothing to do with the case. It is uncertain whether the defendant paid the rent with his own money or with a third party's money.

The third piece of evidence is the chat records before the defendant broke up with the third party. The plaintiff recognizes its authenticity, legitimacy and relevance, but the purpose of the proof is not recognized. The two said so verbally, but it does not mean that it is so in reality. made.

The fourth piece of evidence is the QQ and WeChat chat records and transfer records of the third party’s loan from the defendant. The plaintiff believes that this evidence has nothing to do with the case.This is a loan dispute between the third party and the defendant, which should be handled separately. " said the plaintiff's lawyer.

As a practicing lawyer, although she is inexperienced, she has already made a preliminary judgment on the whole case from the evidence provided by Fang Yi. When the plaintiff came to her before, there were deviations in what she said, such as the plaintiff and the third party. Deliberately concealed the fact that the third party borrowed money from the defendant.

But when she accepted the entrustment, she had to speak for the client. Even if she knew what was true and what was wrong, so what. Her job was not to discuss the merits of the case, but to maximize the interests of the client.Although she was conflicted in her heart, she had to do it this way.

"The third person cross-examined." The female judge said.

"I agree with the chat records provided by the defendant, but I don't agree with the content of the proof. It's over." The third person said.

"What is the reason for disapproval?" asked the female judge.

"I... I chat with her as a chat, but it's not like that. The money I give her is a gift." The third person's eyes were in a trance, and he glanced at his daughter-in-law sitting on the plaintiff's seat from time to time.

"Plaintiff, you said that the money transferred to the defendant by the third party was a free gift. Apart from the evidence already submitted, is there any other evidence to prove that the money was a free gift?" the female judge asked.

"There is no other evidence. The 15 yuan was transferred in batches. The small amount was 3000 yuan, and the large amount was 5000 yuan. Because of the abnormal relationship between the third party and the defendant, it is common sense , the money should be a gift." The female lawyer defended.

"Defendant's agent, does the third person live with the defendant, or occasionally for a few days?" asked the female judge.

"Basically, when the plaintiff is not at home, the third person lives with the defendant." Fang Yi said.

"Plaintiff, what is the nature of your work? Do you need to travel frequently?" asked the female judge.

"The plaintiff is a senior executive of the company. He was sent to other provinces as the general manager six years ago, so he is resident in other provinces and can take vacations every once in a while," said the female lawyer.

It is a fact that the plaintiff does not work in the province. As long as the judge goes to the unit to investigate, it will be known, so the female lawyer does not have to lie about this matter.

"The third person, is that so?" The female judge looked at the fat man with a hint of disgust in her eyes.

"Yes, my daughter-in-law is often not at home. That's why I hate it forever if I make a mistake." The attitude of the third person was very good.

"Third person, do you often live in the defendant's place?" the female officer asked.

"I live with her most of the time." The third person said.

"What do you do?" asked the female judge.

"I opened a labor service company in the county." The third person said.

(End of this chapter)