my scientific age

Chapter 64 seems like it shouldn't be a single chapter.

Chapter 64 seems like it shouldn't be a single chapter.

Say what?

emmm, don't know.

Don't know where to start, don't know where to end.

Just talk.

Well, regarding the knowledge blockade, someone said in the comment section: In the late Qing Dynasty, it could produce cannons, machine guns, and weapons, and so could the Republic of China. The arsenals of the Republic of China, such as Jinling, Northeast, Northwest, Taiyuan, etc., were not industrial manufacturing?Are there no drawings?

Yes, there is.

But the question is, do you know what a standard is?
You expect the Republic of China industry, which is at the bottom of the industry, to figure out a set of drawing standards by yourself, right?
From the end of the Qing Dynasty to the beginning of the Republic of China, and before the founding of the People's Republic of China, which industry field was not controlled by others?

In the Jiangnan Manufacturing Bureau in the late Qing Dynasty, more than 100 kinds of machines that Zeng Guofan entrusted Rong Hong to purchase from Park Denan Company in New York, USA, were all incorporated into the Jiangnan Manufacturing Bureau.

In the late Qing Dynasty, the Fuzhou Ship Administration Bureau, in 1865, Zuo Zongtang sent the Mingdeke monument to Europe to order the machinery and materials needed for the construction of the shipyard.

There are foreign shadows here.

Take another example, the aircraft manufacturing industry of the Republic of China, yes, the Zhonghang factory can build aircraft, 51% of the shares of the Republic of China, 49 shares of the United States, co-authored technology from China, right?

Also, aerodynamics was a brand-new discipline in the 30s, as was aircraft design. Before it appeared, the aviation industry was not taken seriously, which is why the aviation industry was able to develop and establish a Zhonghang factory in the early Republic of China.

Did the block of knowledge mentioned in the article mention "other than aerodynamics and aircraft design"?
Back to topic.

Who can't draw?
Not to mention the distance, Zhang Daqian Zhang from the Republic of China has superb painting skills.

But cartographic standards have not been systematically studied, who understands?
The industry of the Republic of China did not have a set of its own technical common language. Others hid the drawings, and they themselves hid the technology. The blueprints are given to you, and you can copy them.

Note that it is a copy.

However, you only know what it is, don't know why, without your own drawing standards, you will never be able to use the reverse push on this drawing to come up with your own real thing.

The workers only saw the technology on the drawings, while Fang Yu and Zhou Yuan, who were students, saw the drawing standards.

Some people say that there are so many people who go to Japan to study abroad, and those universities have not prevented Chinese students from learning knowledge.

Yes, there is indeed no obstruction. Usually, I don't stop you from holding sports rallies. When the limelight is tight, I ask you to come to evacuate, treat you well, and go back when you are successful.

I do not deny the positive meaning of studying in Japan. After all, many people have been there. Now I can type on the keyboard here. Thanks to many people here, I am very grateful and respectful. However, we should not ignore one thing. the other side.

And what is the essence of knowledge blockade?
Block the road.

The mechanical field blocks drawing standards, and the chemical field blocks technical equipment.

You have aircraft in the Republic of China, I won't mention the performance of the aircraft. You have a cannon and a steel industry in the Republic of China, so what?
than me?

My annual steel output is hundreds of W, and my annual steel output is thousands of W. I have a complete industrial base that can be upgraded and developed independently. How about you?
In front of me, you are the meat on the chopping board.

The term knowledge blockade originated in modern times, and an article called knowledge blockade, capability isolation, strategic capture and low-end lock-in effects formed an empirical study.

This is one of the sources of inspiration.

The content explained in it is very real. The impact of knowledge blockade, capability isolation and strategic capture on the formation of low-end lock-in effect, the results show:
Knowledge blockade leads to the lack of technological upgrading ability, thus forming a low-end lock-in effect;
Market isolation leads to the lack of market upgrade ability, which in turn forms a low-end lock-in effect;
Strategic capture leads to a lack of willingness to upgrade, which in turn creates a low-end lock-in effect.

What do you mean?
Lock up your country.

I also apply the Cold War thinking to the 30s, mixed with private goods, and don't write my own things. I am the co-author to write history books, right?
Tell some people that the West's desire to devour China has never been broken, and Japan's desire to devour China has persisted to this day.

Without the October Revolution in the north, I might still be working in 007 in the factory, one day a month a month, and I can only have enough food and clothing a year.

As for the Hou Debang that some people say, it just so happens, emmm, here is a spoiler, the setting is that the knowledge blockade originated in the Jiawu period, was stricter than Hou Debang, climaxed in 1933, eased with Soviet aid, and ended at the end of World War II.

Then, a technology that was familiar to many people, but very new at the time, blocked the road.

Looking at it from the perspective of the 50s, it used to be called killing with a quick knife, but now it is called cutting with a soft knife.

Looking at it from the perspective of the 30s, it was called a soft knife to cut flesh in the future, but now it is called a quick knife to kill.

Looking at my age, I can only sigh with emotion: "History..."

Finally, some people say that there is the first set of cartographic standards on the Westward Journey. Let me tell you that the publication time of the Westward Journey is October 1937. Now the time of the article is optimistic-Tuesday, February 10, 1937 at 2:23 p.m.

Huh, finished talking, sure enough, I really shouldn't open a single chapter. I wrote more than 1000 at once, and I will write another chapter.

See here, ask for a ticket, recommend a ticket.

(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like