Tokyo Barrister: Start the law firm bankruptcy

Chapter 540 Argument
In court, Beiyuan launched a Jedi counterattack.Zhu Ze was also completely stunned, the energy erupted by the young man in front of her was completely beyond her imagination.This experienced administrative litigation lawyer wanted to refute Beiyuan, but under the high-speed operation of his brain, there was nothing.

Our own artillery position seemed to be misfired.

No ammunition can be fired.

Immediately, Zhuzawa was horrified to discover a fact that he could hardly accept—that is, the lawyer named Beiyuan in front of him was right.Indeed, the materials they presented just now are all factual investigations on whether the thesis constitutes plagiarism.The university did not inform Mikiko of the consequences of her degree being revoked, nor did she ask Mikiko to make a statement and justify that her degree would be revoked.

This Beiyuan lawyer...he...he said...is correct...

A drop of cold sweat slid down the back of Zhu Ze's neck.

Since when did this lawsuit become like this.

The faces of the senior university officials sitting in the auditorium also changed.The instant reversal of the situation came so quickly.Just now, the university side presented so many materials, and it seemed to be firmly on the dominant side, but after a few paragraphs from the lawyer Miao Miao, it turned out to be irrelevant materials to the case.

At this moment, even Asakurahiko who was sitting on the side couldn't help frowning slightly.This great authority on administrative law smelled a hint of danger.At this moment, he also understood why this young man was able to repeatedly succeed in blackmail lawsuits from large enterprises.It seems that behind this, this young man still has a little level.

But that's it.

Dongtu has a mythological novel called "Journey to the West".Even if you have the ability to wreak havoc in heaven, you can't escape the Tathagata's palm!

Asakura Yan got up from the dock, looked at the trial seat and said, "Chief judge. The point of view of the plaintiff's lawyer has also been mentioned in the previous court investigation. We have also explained to the court. When the expert team investigated, it had already Orally informed Mei Xizi that she would be revoked her doctorate. Although the "Investigation Record" did not contain the content of the oral notification by the expert group, Mei Xizi signed the "Investigation Record" and expressed her willingness to accept all punishment results of the university. This can also in turn confirm that the expert group has reminded Mikiko of the corresponding consequences."

Listening to Asakurahiko's words, Kitahara sneered, "The evidence provided by the defendant's attorney is too indirect. Mikiko herself stated that she is willing to accept all punishment results from the university, and it cannot be directly deduced that the university expert group has informed her of the corresponding Consequences of being revoked degree. In this case, Kyoto University bears the burden of proof to prove the legality of its actions. If the facts fall into a state of unclear authenticity, Kyoto University should bear the consequences of not being able to prove it.”

"I would like to remind the other party's attorney not to be so conclusive." Asakurahiko said, "Whether the degree deprivation in this case is an administrative action is itself a question to be determined. Secondly, the plaintiff claimed that the university did not inform Mikiko The consequences of the degree being revoked are also untrue. The university expert group has indeed informed Mikiko of the consequences of the degree being revoked."

"Take a step back." Asakurahiko took out a printed email, "I would like to ask the plaintiff's attorney to pay attention. During the communication between Kyoto University and Mikiko, the expert group once forwarded the "Kyoto University Research "Graduate Student Code" and "Kyoto University Graduate Student Handbook". In the above-mentioned codes and manuals, it has been clearly stipulated that if the application for a doctoral degree contains serious academic misconduct, the degree will be revoked. "

Asakurahiko started pressing Kitahara step by step.

Miya Chuan, who was at the side, heard these plausible words, and his body was already trembling slightly with anger.Universities are blatantly lying.Before that, both she and Kitahara had asked Mikiko repeatedly and checked her mobile phone and email. The university did not inform Mikiko that her misconduct in the thesis would lead to the revocation of her degree.But now, in court, the two defendant lawyers facing each other publicly claimed that the university expert group had informed Mei Xizi of the consequences of the revocation of her degree.Why, they can lie so shamelessly and openly.

Especially Asakurahiko.

The great authority on administrative law.

He also gave lectures at the University of Tokyo.

And it was such a great authority who blatantly lied in court.

Yes, this is the harsh reality.

People who are regarded as authorities, on the contrary, lie even more.

Bystanders who don't know what's going on, treat the authoritative words like gods.

As soon as the great professor's words fell, Beiyuan immediately retorted forcefully: "Chief referee. Both the so-called "Rules for Students of Kyoto University Graduate School" and "Student Handbook of Kyoto University Graduate School" in the attachments have hundreds of pages. It is obviously absurd for the defendant's agent to fulfill the duty of disclosure by forwarding two documents up to hundreds of pages. The notification must be specific, clear and clear. The way of forwarding the notification of the university handbook is neither specific nor specific. , is not clear. The plaintiff Mikiko was even asked to find the university handbook to check the relevant content. Can this be regarded as fulfilling the duty of disclosure?"

"If this is considered to have fulfilled the obligation of disclosure, then wouldn't the university be able to use the content of the handbook and students should know it in the future, and claim that the relevant obligation of disclosure has been fulfilled?! This is obviously extremely absurd!"

The expression on Asakurahiko's face became more and more displeased, "Chief referee. Since the focus of the dispute between the two parties is whether the university expert team has fulfilled the obligation of informing Mikiko. What the defendant's agent wants to say is that the university expert team reported to Mikiko that day. The place where Mikiko conducted the interview was in the classroom of the Biology Building. There were students who were doing self-study in the classroom at that time. They can testify to the content of the conversation that the university expert group had with Mikiko."

"In this regard, the defendant's representative now applies to the court for one of the students who was in the classroom that day—Mayu Chida to testify in court to clarify the truth to the court!"

The Kyoto University side resorted to the killer.

Attempts to remedy procedural violations through witness testimony.

This kind of witness application seems to have a rogue-like unscrupulous laughter.

It seems to be telling the plaintiff nakedly, even if I broke the law, so what.

At this time, Judge Kawada on the referee's seat nodded slightly, "Next, the court summoned the witness Mayu Chida to appear in court to testify to the court."

(End of this chapter)