Tokyo Barrister: Start the law firm bankruptcy

In the courtroom, Beiyuan asked for the minutes of the three discussion meetings of the university's public academic degree evaluation committee, which immediately attracted many senior university officials in the auditorium to whisper and whisper.The lawyer even reported the codes of the meeting minutes so accurately. At first glance, the sense of convincing was too strong.The high level of the university is naturally worried. They haven't read the minutes of these three so-called meetings in detail, and they don't know what content exists in these meeting minutes.

The unknown creates anxiety.

And anxiety breeds fear.

Even if the minutes of these meetings are innocuous, university executives are reluctant to make them public.No one will voluntarily expose the process of power operation to the public eye.

Several secretaries from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology who came to observe, saw the appearance of the senior officials of the court university, and couldn't help frowning slightly, showing a little displeasure on their faces.It seemed to be reprimanding the high-level university officials present for failing to keep this basic document confidential.

Right now, Bei Yuan did raise an important question.In the internal voting of the expert group, 7 people determined that the plagiarism was established, and 6 people determined that the plagiarism was not established.Among the 7 people who voted plagiarism to be established, 2 people believed that the behavior was not serious enough to lead to the revocation of their degrees.Under such circumstances, why did the university's degree evaluation committee still ignore the internal differences of the expert group and decide to deprive Mikiko of her doctorate?

Taking a look at the scene in the courtroom, Zhuze realized that the situation had become somewhat unfavorable to him.She couldn't believe the situation she was facing now.This kind of seemingly absurd lawsuit, but when actually dealing with it, actually... actually felt strenuous? !
After calming down, the experienced administrative law female lawyer spoke again:

"Chief referee. The authenticity of the meeting minutes presented by the plaintiff is unclear, and the university cannot confirm the authenticity of these documents. As for the plaintiff's claim that it wants to obtain the minutes of the three internal meetings of the university, the plaintiff should prove that the university degree evaluation committee has Three meetings were held to discuss the revocation of Mei Xizi's degree. Instead of blindly using the so-called "plaintiff heard" and "according to the plaintiff's knowledge", it is inferred that the degree evaluation committee has held three relevant meetings."

The strategy chosen by Takezawa is to firmly deny.

The reason is very simple. The current lawyer named Beiyuan got this information from nowhere.

This means that he said that he has obtained more information channels than himself and Asakura Yan.

You know, the faction represented by Professor Ochi has been asking the university to re-investigate the Mikiko incident. Maybe there are some important information points that I don't have in the whole incident, and these important information points may be discovered by the other party. Lawyers give mastery.

If this is the case, then it is best to infer the information the opponent has based on his actions.If this Beiyuan lawyer wanted to transfer the minutes of the three meetings, he must be absolutely stopped.

Listening to Takezawa's rebuttal, Kitahara still kept a faint smile on his face, "If the attorney for the defendant refuses to submit these three meeting minutes to the court, then the attorney for the plaintiff will represent my client, Mikiko Tamai, in the case of Kyoto University's refusal." The act of disclosing information, file an administrative lawsuit for information disclosure!"

【Administrative Litigation of Information Disclosure】

[The so-called information disclosure administrative lawsuit refers to the failure of the administrative agency to disclose information to the administrative counterpart according to law, or the act of disclosing information is illegal.In this case, the counterparty can sue the administrative agency and request to correct its administrative behavior related to information disclosure]

Nothing happened.

Waves and flats.

Kitahara claimed that he would file another public information lawsuit against Kyoto University.

This is another heavy blow to Kyoto University, which is in urgent need of endorsement from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Society for the Promotion of Science.Mikiko's matter may be resolved in a short period of time.But now there is an open information lawsuit, which is one lawsuit on top of another, and it will not be resolved so quickly.

Many high-level university officials are already somber.They also saw that this lawyer seemed to be targeting Kyoto University, and every move he made was trying to embarrass the university and make the university lose face.Now, if there is one more lawsuit, it is almost as if Mikiko alone will drag the university into an endless whirlpool.

What a troublemaker who only knows how to make trouble!

Trouble!

Takezawa straightened his collar slightly, and immediately refuted Kitahara Michi, "Chief referee, let's ignore the question of whether the so-called meeting minutes exist or not. Regarding the substantive trial proposed by the plaintiff's attorney on whether Mikiko was suspected of plagiarism, the defendant's attorney I think it's utterly ridiculous."

"Judicial power should maintain sufficient modesty. The law should only do what the law does, and should not go beyond the boundaries to make judgments for professional groups. In this case, it is necessary for a professional academic group to determine whether the paper involved in the case is suspected of plagiarism. , can only be judged and screened. Whether the purpose of the paper is the same, whether the text is substantially repeated, whether there is no fundamental difference between the two viewpoints, etc. This is a field that requires a lot of professional knowledge to judge. Judicial Organs should not overstep the boundaries and regard themselves as professional academics to express their so-called opinions on whether plagiarism is true or not!"

"Chief referee!" Kitahara also stepped forward and said, "The defendant's attorney has obviously distorted the facts again and again. Now, the materials presented by the plaintiff can clearly and undoubtedly show that the expert team is distorting the truth about Mei Xizi. There is a major disagreement on whether the thesis constitutes plagiarism. From this, it can be revealed whether the defendant had sufficient factual evidence when he deprived Mei Xizi of his degree. This kind of trial is by no means for the court to judge whether plagiarism is established, but Let the court judge whether there are sufficient factual reasons for the plagiarism determination made by the University Degree Evaluation Committee, and whether these reasons themselves are reasonable enough. Therefore, this case should obviously go to trial on whether Mei Xizi's thesis is suspected of plagiarism!"

The two lawyers were at odds with each other in court, and they were at each other's throats.

At this moment, this question was placed before Judge Kawada.

How will he decide?

The eyes of the audience immediately focused on the chief referee.

Judge Kawada pinched his brows lightly.From the judge's point of view, every referee is committed to making the case simpler, not complicated.Right now, it is obvious that if the alleged plagiarism of Mei Xizi's thesis itself is not reviewed, then there will inevitably be more additional lawsuits in the future, which is really unnecessary.

Judge Kawada raised his head, glanced at the male plaintiff lawyer who kept causing "trouble", and then said: "Next, the university can present evidence that Mikiko's thesis constitutes plagiarism."